Abstract:Background: Liver cirrhosis, as the terminal phase of chronic liver disease fibrosis, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional methods for assessing liver function, such as clinical scoring systems, offer only a global evaluation and may not accurately reflect regional liver function variations. This study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic potential of whole-liver histogram analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting the progression of cirrhosis. Methods: In this retrospective study, 265 consecutive patients with cirrhosis admitted to the Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from August 2012 to September 2019 were enrolled. After the exclusion criteria were applied, 117 patients (84 males and 33 females) were divided into Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (n=43), Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (n=49), and Child-Pugh C cirrhosis (n=25). After correction for liver signal intensity with the spleen was completed, 19 histogram features of the whole liver were extracted and modeled to evaluate liver function, with the Child-Pugh class being incorporated as a clinical parameter. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnosis capability and determine the optimal cutoffs after a mean follow-up of 42.3±19.1 (range, 8-93) months. The association between significant histogram features and the cumulative incidence of hepatic insufficiency was analyzed with the adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve model. Results: Among 117 patients (12%), 14 developed hepatic insufficiency through a period of follow-up. Five features, including the median (P<0.01), 90th percentile (P<0.01), root mean squared (P<0.01), mean (P<0.01), and 10th percentile (P<0.05), were significantly different between the groups with and without hepatic insufficiency according to the Kruskal-Wallis test; in the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) of these features was 0.723 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.653-0.793], 0.722 (95% CI: 0.652-0.792), 0.722 (95% CI: 0.652-0.792), 0.721 (95% CI: 0.651-0.791), and 0.674 (95% CI: 0.600-0.748) after correction, respectively (all P values <0.05). Median, 90th percentile, root mean squared, and mean were found to be significant factors in predicting liver insufficiency. The adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that patients with a feature level less than the cutoff, as compared to those with a level above the cutoff, showed a statistically shorter progression-free survival and higher incidences of hepatic insufficiency for significant features of median (cutoff =26.001; 21.28% versus 5.71%; P=0.02), 90th percentile (cutoff =86.263; 20.41% versus 5.88%; P<0.01), root mean squared (cutoff =1,028.477; 19.15% versus 7.14%; P=0.049), and mean (cutoff =27.484; 19.15% versus 7.14%; P=0.049). Patients with a 10th percentile less than -39.811 also showed a higher cumulative incidence of hepatic insufficiency than did those with a value higher than the cutoff (0.18% versus 7.46%; P=0.22). Conclusions: Whole-liver histogram analysis of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI may serve as a noninvasive analytical method to predict hepatic insufficiency in patients with cirrhosis.

Whether the Liver-to-Portal Vein Ratio is Applicable for Evaluating the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology Hepatobiliary Phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI?

Regional Liver Function Assessment Using Free-breathing T1 Mapping in Gadoxetic Acid–enhanced MRI for Patients with Bile Duct Cancer: A Prospective Study

Application Values of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Radiomics in the Quantitative Assessment of Liver Reserve Function of Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Accuracy of ASGE High-Risk Criteria in Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones

MR Liver Imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA: the Need for Different Delay Times of the Hepatobiliary Phase in Patients with Different Liver Function.

Hepatic Perfusion Parameters of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Correlate with the Severity of Chronic Liver Disease.

Computed tomography perfusion in liver and spleen for hepatitis B virus-related portal hypertension: A correlation study with hepatic venous pressure gradient

99mTc-Phy portal perfusion index imaging helps predict the severity of hepatitis B virus cirrhosis: a preliminary study.

Gd-BOPTA enhanced MRI in evaluation of reserved liver function

Inter-observer agreement on the assessment of relative liver lesion signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase imaging with gadoxetate (Gd-EOB-DTPA)

[The Value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in Patients with Major Resection of Liver Cancer].

A Non‐invasive Method for Evaluating Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension by Administration of 99mtc‐mibi Per Rectum

Lobe‐Based Hepatic Uptake Index of Gd‐EOB‐DTPA on Contrast‐Enhanced MRI to Quantitatively Discriminate between Compensated and Decompensated Hepatitis B‐Related Cirrhosis

Non-invasive liver disease assessment to identify portal hypertension: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient with liver biopsy: 6 years of endo-hepatology in practice

Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and serum markers in assessing portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis

Optimization of hepatobiliary phase imaging in gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a narrative review

Whole-liver histogram analysis of hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for predicting progression in patients with cirrhosis

Utility of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating liver failure risk after major hepatic resection

Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography for Quantitative Assessment of Portal Hypertension in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

CT hepatic arterial perfusion index does not allow stratification of the degree of esophageal varices and bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients in Child–Pugh classes A and B