Abstract:According to a recent social science debate, citizens tend to perceive income inequality rather inaccurately, which also influences their acceptance of redistributive policy programmes. The study reported in this article examines whether this can be confirmed using the example of the wealth tax. The wealth tax was suspended in Germany in 1996, but politicians have been debating its reintroduction for several years. Against the background of the debate on biased perceptions in the formation of distributional policy preferences, the article asks, first, how accurately the existing tax burden on wealthy households through the top income tax rate is assessed and whether a bias has consequences for the support of a wealth tax. Second, based on approaches that attribute an important role to mass media in the formation of distributional policy preferences, the influence of media framing on the acceptance of this controversial instrument is examined. According to data from an online survey, the burden of the top income tax tends to be overestimated. The more the tax is overestimated, the lower the political support for a wealth tax. Framing experiments with randomized control and treatment groups have mapped current discourses around the wealth tax and reconstructed positive frames-wealth taxes as an investment promoting tax reform, as a contribution to the reduction of national debt caused by the coronavirus pandemic-as well as negative frames-restriction of investments and loss of jobs if companies are burdened. Exposing potential job losses significantly lowers the support for a wealth tax. Strong support drops to the middle category of "partly/partly," a signal of indecision. The struggle for naming power is thus open. Support for a property tax becomes uncertain the more that political communication activates the framework of threatened jobs.

Does Inequality Still Matter? Income Heterogeneity and Local Government Expenditure

It’s Not Just Welfare: Racial Inequality and the Local Provision of Public Goods in the United States

Inequality as an externality: Consequences for tax design

Are there inequality spillovers? Evidence through a modified inequality measure and European dynamics of inequality

Government consumption in the DINA framework: allocation methods and consequences for post-tax income inequality

The Influence of Inequality on Welfare Generosity

Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

Higher income individuals are more generous when local economic inequality is high

Local Education Expenditures and Educational Inequality in China

The role of public social expenditure for mitigating local income inequality: An investigation across spatial scales in Austria

A note on redistributive fairness and economic reform

An uneven landscape of public services for people of color: identifying endogeneity in the relationship between local race composition and public expenditure

Income inequality and the growth of redistributive spending in the United States (US) states: is there a link?

Measuring inequality beyond the Gini coefficient may clarify conflicting findings

Does Income Inequality Affect Green Innovation? A Non-Linear Evidence

The public provision of goods in democracies: Do age and inequality matter?

Government Spending and Local Demographics: Evidence from Moody's Municipal Ratings Recalibration

[Perceived Inequality and Political Demand]

Unpacking income inequality and population health: the peculiar absence of geography

The Government May Want to Encourage Price-Discrimination by Income

Revisiting the Income Inequality-Crime Puzzle