Analysis of clinical data of lower limbs deep vein thrombosis in inpatients with advanced age in internal medicine
Wu Dong,Wang Zheng,Liu Huilin,Zhang Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2022.04.018
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the treatment and prognosis of advanced age inpatients in Medical Department with lower limbs deep venous thrombosis(DVT).Methods:This was a retrospective study of elderly medical inpatients with DVT, including 58 males(54.7%)and 48 females(45.3%), aged from 80 to 99 years old, in Geriatric Medicine of Peking University Third Hospital from March 2016 to March 2019.There were 91 patients(85.9%)with DVT alone and 15 patients(15.2%)with pulmonary embolism.The clinical data of patients were analyzed, and treatment and prognosis within half a year after discharge were followed-up.Results:A total of 106 elderly medical patients were included, the ratio of male to female was 1.2∶1.0, the age range was 80-99 years old, the median age was 86 years old.Of a total of 106 DVT patients, forty-five cases(42.5%)developed symptoms, sixty-one cases(57.6%)were asymptomatic.Twenty-eight cases(26.4%)involved the proximal lower limb deep veins(popliteal veins and above), seventy-eight cases(73.6%)only involved distal deep veins.Except for advanced age, other DVT risk factors included sixty cases(56.6%)of lung infection, 58 cases(54.7%)being bedridden(>3 d), 50 cases(47.2%)of type 2 diabetes, 46 cases(43.4%)of cerebral infarction, 37 cases(34.9%)of heart failure, and 28 cases(26.4%)of active malignancies, etc.Of a total of 106 DVT patients, 80 cases(75.5%)had high risk of venous thrombosis score, and 68 cases(64.2%)had high risk of bleeding.74 cases received anticoagulant treatment, the rate of anticoagulant treatment was 69.8%.Compared with anticoagulant patients, non-anticoagulant group showed that renal insufficiency, being bedridden, heart failure, cerebral infarction prevalence, and all-cause mortality were increased( P<0.05 or P<0.01).The rate of high risk of bleeding was significantly higher in the non-anticoagulation group than in the anticoagulation group( P<0.01).The pulmonary embolism rate, proximal deep vein involvement rate and their improvement rate when timely rechecking were significantly higher in anticoagulation group than in non-anticoagulation group( P<0.05 or P<0.01, respectively).In the anticoagulation group, 26 patients received short term low-molecular heparin(LMH)treatment during hospitalization, 48 patients(45.3%)were prescribed oral anticoagulants at the time of discharge.Anticoagulation treatment rate is 31.1%(33 cases)at 3 months and 24.5%(26 cases)at 6 months.Non-fatal bleeding occurred in 4 patients in anticoagulation group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups( P>0.05). Conclusions:Great attention should be paid to the risk factors such as lung infection, being bedridden, cerebral infarction, and malignant tumor in the elderly medical inpatients.The rate of high risk of bleeding was high in elderly inpatients, and the rate of regular anticoagulant treatment is low.The risk versus benefit of anticoagulant therapy should be comprehensively evaluated, and individualized therapy should be given.