U-series isotope constraints on the rates of aeolian-impacted basaltic weathering under tropical climate

Guodong Ming,Jingyi Huang,Jiaru Sheng,Yingzeng Gong,Jiye Guo,Huimin Yu,Wenhan Cheng,Craig C. Lundstrom,Fang Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2024.104673
IF: 4.956
2024-12-11
Global and Planetary Change
Abstract:The chemical weathering of basalt rocks is crucial for stabilizing Earth's habitability and carbon cycle. Currently, the soil chemistry and weathering rates of basalt under significant aeolian influence are not fully understood. This study addresses this gap by investigating the U geochemistry and regolith production rates in a highly weathered basalt profile in Southern China. The εNd(0) values decrease from the bedrock sample (4.68) to the top soils (0.94), indicating aerosol input from the top. Dust accretion decrease downward and significantly affects the vertical distribution of U (R 2 = 0.86), while the chemical mobilization of U is controlled by binding with Fe oxides-organic matter complexes (R 2 = 0.33).The influence of dust accretion diminishes to insignificant (less than 9 % for U amount) below 330 cm, meeting the model's criteria for estimating U-series isotope-based regolith production rates. The estimated regolith production rates for depths of 445 cm, 370 cm, and 330 cm are ~10 m/Myr, ~ 5.5 m/Myr, and ~ 3 m/Myr, respectively. These rates decrease with increasing depth, illustrating the depletion of soluble materials as the weathering profile thickens. CO 2 consumption fluxes calculated from soil chemistry (<193 × 10 3 mol/km 2 /yr) are lower than those from river chemistry. Regolith development in the Leizhou Peninsula may account for <25 % of total chemical erosion, suggesting significant hidden erosion processes. These observations indicate that other potential weathering sources in aquifers and steeper terrains should be independently estimated when assessing basin-scale CO 2 consumption.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,geography, physical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?