Abstract:Objectives: In the 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines, the hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was revised to mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)>20 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) at rest. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of PH. Methods: Patients with dyspnea or highly suspected PH who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) in Beijing Anzhen hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from September 2021 to October 2022 were enrolled retrospectively. According to resting hemodynamics, the patients were divided into 3 groups: no-PH (mPAP≤20 mmHg) group, low-pressure PH (20 mmHg<mPAP<25 mmHg) group and high-pressure PH (mPAP≥25 mmHg) group. The diagnosis and classification of PH and the hemodynamic parameters in different groups were compared before and after the revision of diagnostic criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of maximum of mPAP (mPAPmax) and mPAP/cardiac output (CO) slope of multi-point in PH. Results: A total of 117 patients were included for analysis, the age was (53.7±17.5) years, 37 (31.6%) patients were male. According to the 2022 ESC/ERS definition, 99 patients were diagnosed as PH, including 8 patients (6.8%) in the low-pressure PH group and 91 patients (77.8%) in the high-pressure PH group. There were 18 patients (15.4%) in the non-PH group. Comparing to the 2015 ESC/ERS definition, 8 patients were newly diagnosed as PH. Echocardiography indexes pulmonary systolic pressure (sPAP) [(57.6±7.3) vs (38.5±13.6) mmHg], max tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRVmax) [(360.4±28.9) vs (271.4±52.2) cm/s] and RHC index mPAP [(22.2±1.3) vs (16.1±2.6) mmHg] in low-pressure PH group were higher than those in no-PH group (all P<0.05). However, further analysis of hemodynamics during exercise showed mPAPmax [(42.1±5.6) vs (35.6±4.7) mmHg, P=0.006] and mPAP/CO slope of multi-point [(4.9±1.3) vs (3.6±1.1) mmHg·L-1·min-1,P=0.024] in low-pressure PH group were higher than those in no-PH group. The ROC curve cut-off value of mPAPmax for the diagnosis of PH was 39 mmHg, with a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 76.5%, and the area under the curve (AUC) and 95%CI is 0.816 (0.638-0.994). The ROC curve cut-off value of mPAP/CO slope of multi-point for the diagnosis of PH was 4.44 mmHg·L-1·min-1,with a sensitivity of 75.0%, a specificity of 76.5%, and an AUC (95%CI) of 0.794 (0.606-0.983). Conclusion: After the revision of the hemodynamic definition of PH in the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines, more PH patients with pulmonary vascular disease are detected, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and treatment.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Electrocardiogram in Pulmonary Hypertension and the Role of "R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1"

A Combination of Clinical, Electrocardiographic, and Echocardiographic Parameters Predicts Pulmonary Hypertension Occurrence in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

Diagnostic Value of Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic Value of Electrocardiogram in Pulmonary Artery Hypertension

The Role of Echocardiography in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Pulmonary Hypertension

Remembering the Occam's Razor: Could Simple Electrocardiographic Findings Provide Relevant Predictions for Current Hemodynamic Criteria of Pulmonary Hypertension?

The predictive value of minute ventilation versus carbon dioxide production in pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease

[Impact of the 2022 ESC/ERS revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension]

Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension - re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension

Diagnostic Accuracy of Transthoracic Echocardiography for Pulmonary Hypertension: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Cardiac Pulsed Wave Doppler Pattern of the Common Femoral Vein in Diagnosing the Likelihood of Severe Pulmonary Hypertension: Results from a Prospective Multicentric Study

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing improves diagnostic specificity in patients with echocardiography-suspected pulmonary hypertension.

Non-invasive Screening for Pulmonary Hypertension in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Clinical Characterizations and Severity Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension

External validation of different clinical and echocardiographic scores to distinguish post‐ from precapillary pulmonary hypertension

Assessing the precision of machine learning for diagnosing pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Their Association with Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

The accuracy and influencing factors of Doppler echocardiography in estimating pulmonary artery systolic pressure: comparison with right heart catheterization: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Prognostic Relevance of Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion to Systolic Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Ratio and Its Association With Exercise Hemodynamics in Patients With Normal or Mildly Elevated Resting Pulmonary Arterial Pressure

Right Ventricular-Vascular Uncoupling Predicts Pulmonary Hypertension in Clinically Diagnosed Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

New criteria for diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension: pros and cons