Abstract:Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disease. Currently, patients' treatment choices depend on their clinical symptoms observed by clinicians, which are subjective. Rich evidence suggests that different functional networks' dysfunctions correspond to different intervention preferences. In this study, we aimed to develop a prediction model based on data-driven subgroups to provide treatment recommendations.Methods: All 630 participants enrolled from four sites underwent functional magnetic resonances imaging at baseline. In the discovery data set (n = 228), we first identified MDD subgroups by the hierarchical clustering method using the canonical variates of resting-state functional connectivity (FC) through canonical correlation analyses. The demographic symptom improvement and FC were compared among subgroups. The preference intervention for each subgroup was also determined. Next, we predicted the individual treatment strategy. Specifically, a patient was assigned into predefined subgroups based on FC similarities and then his/her treatment strategy was determined by the subgroups' preferred interventions.Results: Three subgroups with specific treatment recommendations were emerged, including (1) a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors-oriented subgroup with early improvements in working and activities, (2) a stimulation-oriented subgroup with more alleviation in suicide, and (3) a selective serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors-oriented subgroup with more alleviation in hypochondriasis. Through cross-dataset testing, respectively, conducted on three testing data sets, results showed an overall accuracy of 72.83%.Conclusions: Our works revealed the correspondences between subgroups and their treatment preferences and predicted individual treatment strategy based on such correspondences. Our model has the potential to support psychiatrists in early clinical decision making for better treatment outcomes. Impact statementThis study proposes a novel framework to provide treatment recommendations by integrating resting-state functional connectivity and advanced machine learning technique in a large data set. Our data-driven approach is able to objectively and automatically cluster patients into different subgroups and recommends the optimal treatment strategies based on specific brain circuits and clinical symptoms. Our results have the potential to support psychiatrists in early clinical decision making for better treatment outcomes.

Correction: Identifying and validating subtypes within major psychiatric disorders based on frontal–posterior functional imbalance via deep learning

Redefining and subtyping of major depression based on brain functional connectivity signatures with high generalization: an ensemble hybrid framework

Atomic dynamic functional interaction patterns for characterization of ADHD.

DISTINGUISHING BIPOLAR DEPRESSION FROM MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER USING FNIRS AND DEEP NEURAL NETWORK

Biotypes of major depressive disorder: Neuroimaging evidence from resting-state default mode network patterns.

Response to: Significance and stability of deep learning-based identification of subtypes within major psychiatric disorders. Molecular Psychiatry (2022)

Identifying Subgroups of Major Depressive Disorder Using Brain Structural Covariance Networks and Mapping of Associated Clinical and Cognitive Variables

Identification of psychiatric disorder subtypes from functional connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography

Correction: Functional Brain Networks in Never-Treated and Treated Long-Term Ill Schizophrenia Patients

Neuropsychiatric Disorder Subtyping Via Clustered Deep Learning Classifier Explanations

Neurostructural subgroup in 4291 individuals with schizophrenia identified using the subtype and stage inference algorithm

Author Correction: Predicting Individual Responses to the Electroconvulsive Therapy with Hippocampal Subfield Volumes in Major Depression Disorder

Predicting Treatment Selections for Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder According to Functional Connectivity Subgroups

Corrigendum: Aberrant functional connectivity of sensorimotor network and its relationship with executive dysfunction in bipolar disorder type I

Dimensional subtyping of first-episode drug-naïve major depressive disorder: A multisite resting-state fMRI study

Identification of transdiagnostic psychiatric disorder subtypes using unsupervised learning

Identification of depression subtypes and relevant brain regions using a data-driven approach

Subcortical volumetric alterations in four major psychiatric disorders: a mega-analysis study of 5604 subjects and a volumetric data-driven approach for classification

Erratum to: Aberrant dynamic functional connectivity of thalamocortical circuitry in major depressive disorder

Two neurostructural subtypes: results of machine learning on brain images from 4,291 individuals with schizophrenia

Correction: Individual-specific Functional Connectivity Markers Track Dimensional and Categorical Features of Psychotic Illness