Abstract:Researchers have highlighted the relations among language, culture and thinking for a long time and there have been two viewpoints including Universalism and Relativism concerning this topic. Universalism assumes that we comprehend, produce and learn language using the same cognitive mechanisms. Relativism by Sapir-Whorf hypothesis assumes that language affect cognition. Researchers have found a large body of evidences supporting Sapir-Whorf hypothesis such as color categorization, spatial reasoning, temporal comparisons, and grammatical gender. Language is an important factor that may influence how we reason about the world, or even how we perceive it. The differences of English and Chinese mainly reflect in word order when scene is expressed. Do structural differences of language lead to differentiation of scenery cognition? What is the mechanism if languages can lead subjects to process scenes differently? To investigate the above problems may help to furthering the research on the relationships of language, culture and thinking, as well as providing evidence for the impact of language on cognition. <br> Eye movement experiment was used to investigate the impact of primed language on Chinese-English bilinguals’ scene processing. A total of 20 college students (7 males and 13 females) were participated in this study. 2 (language style) × 3 (picture-text consistency relations) design was used. Language style contained Chinese and English, picture-text consistency relations contained three types including consistency condition, foreground object inconsistency condition and background information inconsistency condition. The materials included 48 pictures and 96 primed phrases (48 Chinese phrases and 48 English phrases respectively). Among the 48 pairs of picture-text materials, there were 16 pairs sharing the same meaning between the contents of pictures and the meaning of primed phrases;the meaning of 16 primed phrases were different from the contents of pictures which was mainly reflected in the foregrounds; the meaning of 16 primed phrases were different from the contents of pictures which was mainly reflected in the backgrounds. At the beginning of the experiment, primed phrases of English or Chinese were presented, and then subjects were asked to judge the consistency relations of pictures-text pairs under Chinese and English primed conditions. <br> The results showed that primed phrases influenced bilinguals’ scene processing. Significant differences occurred on several eye movement index under the English and Chinese conditions such as the fixation duration, the fixation duration in objects, the fixation duration in backgrounds, the number of fixations in backgrounds, and the average fixation duration. The proportion of fixations to object across 14 fixations under English and Chinese primed language were depicted, which showed that in English priming condition, the backgrounds obtained extra and fast attention due to the postposition of backgrounds’ information in word order. Under the Chinese condition, the transfer from foregrounds to backgrounds was late and the watching proportion was few. These differences were related to not only the properties of languages but also the depth of processing. Features of eye movement were also influenced by depth of processing. <br> The conclusions were derived from this study:(1) Foreground objects were highlighted in picture-text consistency judgment regardless of Chinese condition or English condition. (2) Language structures affected the properties of eye movements. (3) The depth of processing affected bilinguals’ scene perception.

Lexical and perceptual biases in speakers' syntactic choices

Lexical Category Bias Across Interpreting Types: Implications for Synergy Between Cognitive Constraints and Language Representations

Syntactic Priming in Illiterate and Literate Older Chinese Adults

A cognitive modeling approach to learning and using reference biases in language

Effects of event participant preview and patient animacy in sentence production: a cross-linguistic comparison between English and Russian

Misleading Bias-Driven Expectations in Referential Processing and the Facilitative Role of Contrastive Accent

Social priming of speech perception: The role of individual differences in implicit racial and ethnic associations.

The Self-reference Effect Can Modulate Language Syntactic Processing Even Without Explicit Awareness: An Electroencephalography Study

An Investigation of Cross-Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory

The Interaction of Linguistic and Visual Cues for the Processing of Case in Russian by Russian‐German Bilinguals: An Eye Tracking Study

Error-based structure prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from verb bias effects in a visual-world structural priming paradigm for Mandarin Chinese.

Do structural priming and inverse preference effect demand cognitive resources? Evidence from structural priming in production

Lexically-specific syntactic restrictions in second-language speakers

The Importance of Linguistic Factors: He Likes Subject Referents

John praised Mary because he? Implicit Causality Bias and Its Interaction with Explicit Cues in LMs

Lexical Planning in Sentence Production Is Highly Incremental: Evidence from ERPs.

Syntactic representations encode grammatical functions: evidence from the priming of mapping between grammatical functions and thematic roles in Cantonese

Impact of Primed Language on Chinese-English Bilinguals’ Scene Consistency Judgment

How language influences spatial thinking, categorization of motion events, and gaze behavior: a cross-linguistic comparison

Relative Contributions of Social, Contextual, and Lexical Factors in Speech Processing

Riding the Lexical Speedway: A Critical Review on the Time Course of Lexical Selection in Speech Production