Effect of spironolactone wash‐out on albuminuria after long‐term treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes and high risk of kidney disease—An observational follow‐up of the PRIORITY study

Victor Wasehuus,Viktor Rotbain Curovic,Nete Tofte,Morten Lindhardt,Gemma Currie,Christian Delles,Marie Frimodt‐Møller,Harald Mischak,Heiko von der Leyen,Tine Willum Hansen,Thomas Kümler,Frederik Persson,Peter Rossing,on behalf of the PRIORITY Study group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16037
2024-10-30
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Abstract:Aims This study aimed to explore the effect of discontinuation of long‐term spironolactone treatment on markers of kidney function in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk of kidney disease enrolled in the Proteomic prediction and Renin angiotensin aldosterone system Inhibition prevention Of early diabetic nephRopathy In TYpe 2 diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria (PRIORITY) study. Materials and Methods An observational study following the nested randomised part of the PRIORITY study was conducted. A total of 115 individuals with T2D and normoalbuminuria but high risk for progression based on urinary proteomics, randomised to daily spironolactone (n = 50) or placebo (n = 65) for a median of 2.5 years, were re‐examined approximately 6 weeks after the final visit in the PRIORITY study. Primary endpoint was relative change in geometric mean of urinary albumin‐creatinine ratio (UACR) between the final visit in PRIORITY (baseline) and follow‐up. Secondary endpoints were change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and serum potassium. Results No change in UACR was observed in neither the spironolactone (geometric mean change: 17%; 95% CI −12, 55; p = 0.28) nor the placebo (5%; 95% CI −13, 26; p = 0.63) group at follow‐up. No difference in UACR between the groups was observed at follow‐up (relative difference in geometric mean: 11%, 95% CI −26, 67; p = 0.60). For eGFR and SBP, an increase after discontinuation of spironolactone was observed, as well as for SBP after placebo discontinuation. Potassium levels were lower after discontinuation of spironolactone, but higher after placebo discontinuation (all p
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?