The use of accelerometers to improve estimation of the thermic effect of food in whole room calorimetry studies

Sarah A. Purcell,Samuel R. LaMunion,Kong Y. Chen,Corey A. Rynders,Elizabeth A. Thomas,Edward L. Melanson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00763.2023
2024-05-03
Journal of Applied Physiology
Abstract:We tested whether spontaneous physical activity (SPA) from accelerometers could be used in a whole-room calorimeter to estimate thermic effect of food (TEF). Eleven healthy participants (63% female; age: 27 ± 4 years; body mass index: 22.8 ± 2.6 kg/m 2 ) completed two 23-hour visits in randomized order: one 'fed' with meals provided and one 'fasted' with no food. SPA was measured by ActivPAL and Actigraph accelerometers. Measured TEF was calculated as the difference in total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) between fed and fasted visits and compared to three methods of estimating TEF: 1) SPA-adjusted TEF (adjTEF)-difference in TDEE without SPA between visits, 2) Wakeful TEF-difference in energy expenditure obtained from linear regression and basal metabolic rate during waking hours, 3) 24h TEF-increase in TDEE above SPA and sleeping metabolic rate. Measured TEF was 9.4 ± 4.5% of TDEE. adjTEF (difference in estimated versus measured TEF: activPAL: -0.3 ± 3.3%; Actigraph: -1.8 ± 8.0%) and wakeful TEF (activPAL: -0.9 ± 6.1%; Actigraph: -2.8 ± 7.6%) derived from both accelerometers did not differ from measured TEF (all p>0.05). ActivPAL-derived 24h TEF overestimated TEF (6.8 ± 5.4%, p=0.002), while Actigraph-derived 24h TEF was not significantly different (4.3 ± 9.4%, p=0.156). TEF estimations using activPAL tended to show better individual-level agreement (i.e., smaller coefficients of variation). Both accelerometers can be used to estimate TEF in a whole-room calorimeter; wakeful TEF using activPAL is the most viable option given strong group-level accuracy and reasonable individual agreement.
physiology,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?