Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S as homologous or heterologous COVID-19 booster vaccination: Results of a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial

Mathieu Le Gars,Jerald Sadoff,Vicky Cárdenas,Dirk Heerwegh,Fisseha Tesfaye,Griet Van Roey,Colleen Spicer,Samantha Santoro Matias,Olivia Crayne,Tobias Kamphuis,Frank Struyf,Hanneke Schuitemaker,Macaya Douoguih
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.079
IF: 4.169
2024-06-27
Vaccine
Abstract:COVID-19 vaccine boosters may optimize durability of protection against variants of concern (VOCs). In this randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial, participants received 3 different dose levels of an Ad26.COV2.S booster (5 × 10 10 vp [viral particles], 2.5 × 10 10 vp, or 1 × 10 10 vp) ≥6 months post–primary vaccination with either single-dose Ad26.COV2.S (homologous boost; n = 774) or 2-dose BNT162b2 (heterologous boost; n = 758). Primary endpoints were noninferiority of neutralizing antibody responses at Day 15 post-boost versus Day 29 post–primary vaccination. Secondary endpoints included reactogenicity/safety and neutralizing antibody responses to VOCs. All primary endpoints passed prespecified hierarchical noninferiority criteria by Day 15 post-boost. Geometric mean increases in neutralizing antibody titers against the D614G reference strain ranged from 5.5 to 6.8 at Day 15 for homologous boosting and 12.6 to 22.0 for heterologous boosting. For VOCs, heterologous boosting elicited higher neutralizing antibody responses than homologous boosting. Neutralizing antibody responses were dose-dependent and durable for ≥6 months post-boost. More solicited systemic adverse events occurred following heterologous versus homologous boosting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04999111.
immunology,medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?