Abstract:Pain, when treated inadequately, puts preterm infants at a greater risk of developing clinical and behavioural sequelae because of their immature pain system. Preterm infants in need of intensive care are repeatedly and persistently exposed to noxious stimuli, and this happens during a critical window of their brain development with peak rates of brain growth, exuberant synaptogenesis and the developmental regulation of specific receptor populations. Nearly two‐thirds of infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation require mechanical ventilation for some duration during the newborn period. These neonates are endotracheally intubated and require repeated endotracheal suctioning. Endotracheal suctioning is identified as one of the most frequent and most painful procedures in premature infants, causing moderate to severe pain. Even with improved nursing performance and standard procedures based on neonatal needs, endotracheal suctioning remains associated with mild pain. To evaluate the benefits and harms of non‐pharmacological interventions for the prevention of pain during endotracheal suctioning in mechanically ventilated neonates. Non‐pharmacological interventions were compared to no intervention, standard care or another non‐pharmacological intervention. We conducted searches in June 2023 in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and three trial registries. We searched the reference lists of related systematic reviews, and of studies selected for inclusion. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi‐RCTs and cluster‐RCTs that included term and preterm neonates who were mechanically ventilated via endotracheal tube or via tracheostomy tube and required endotracheal suctioning performed by doctors, nurses, physiotherapists or other healthcare professionals. Our main outcome measures were validated composite pain scores (including a combination of behavioural, physiological and contextual indicators). Secondary outcomes included separate physiological and behavioural pain indicators. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. For continuous outcome measures, we used a fixed‐effect model and reported mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For categorical outcomes, we reported the typical risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD) and 95% CIs. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We included eight RCTs (nine reports), which enroled 386 infants, in our review. Five of the eight studies were included in a meta‐analysis. All studies enrolled preterm neonates. Facilitated tucking versus standard care (four studies) Facilitated tucking probably reduces Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score during endotracheal suctioning (MD −2.76, 95% CI 3.57 to 1.96; I2 = 82%; 4 studies, 148 infants; moderate‐certainty evidence). Facilitated tucking probably has little or no effect during endotracheal suctioning on: heart rate (MD −3.06 beats per minute (bpm), 95% CI −9.33 to 3.21; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 80 infants; low‐certainty evidence); oxygen saturation (MD 0.87, 95% CI −1.33 to 3.08; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 80 infants; low‐certainty evidence); or stress and defensive behaviours (SDB) (MD −1.20, 95% CI −3.47 to 1.07; 1 study, 20 infants; low‐certainty evidence). Facilitated tucking may result in a slight increase in self‐regulatory behaviours (SRB) during endotracheal suctioning (MD 0.90, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.60; 1 study, 20 infants; low‐certainty evidence). No studies reported intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH). Familiar odour versus standard care (one study) Familiar odour during endotracheal suctioning probably has little or no effect on: PIPP score (MD −0.30, 95% CI −2.15 to 1.55; 1 study, 40 infants; low‐certainty evidence); heart rate (MD −6.30 bpm, 95% CI −16.04 to 3.44; 1 study, 40 infants; low‐certainty evidence); or oxygen saturation during endotracheal suctioning (MD −0.80, 95% CI −4.82 to 3.22; 1 study, 40 infants; low‐certainty evidence). No studies reported SRB, SDB or IVH. White noise (one study) White noise during endotracheal suctioning probably has little or no effect on PIPP (MD −0.65, 95% CI −2.51 to 1.21; 1 study, 40 infants; low‐certainty evidence); heart rate (MD −1.85 bpm, 95% CI −11.46 to 7.76; 1 study, 40 infants; low‐certainty evidence); or oxygen saturation (MD 2.25, 95% CI −2.03 to 6.53; 1 study, 40 infants; low‐certainty evidence). No studies reported SRB, SDB or IVH. Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch probably reduces PIPP score. The evidence of a single study suggests that facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch slightly increases self‐regulatory and approach behaviours during endotracheal suctioning. Based on a single study, familiar odour and white noise have little or no effect on an -Abstract Truncated-

The NON-pharmacological Approach to Less Invasive Surfactant Administration trial (NONA-LISA): a call for international collaboration

Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

NON-pharmacological Approach Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (NONA-LISA) trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Using sensor-fusion and machine-learning algorithms to assess acute pain in non-verbal infants: a study protocol

Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA): chances and limitations

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants in Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Germany: A Survey

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation during less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants: An open‐label randomized controlled study

Minimally Invasive Surfactant Administration for the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Study in China

Comparison of Outcomes of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Prematurely Born Infants in the Delivery Suite and the Neonatal Unit

A clinical study evaluating the combination of LISA and SNIPPV for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Compared to Intubation, Surfactant, Rapid Extubation Method in Preterm Neonates: An Umbrella Review

Application of a new type of double-lumen endotracheal tube in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (NISA)

Comparison of "IN-REC-SUR-E" and LISA in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial (IN-REC-LISA trial)

Randomized control study on the outcome of less invasive surfactant administration in premature infants

Curriculum and Assessment Tool for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: an International Delphi Consensus Study

Laryngeal mask airway surfactant administration for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

Predictors of CPAP failure after less-invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants

[Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Pulmonary Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Multicenter Clinical Trial].

Incidence, predictors of success and outcome of LISA in very preterm infants

Non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of pain during endotracheal suctioning in ventilated neonates