The role of ALBI score in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced primary liver tumors: a pooled analysis of two prospective studies

Eleni Gkika,Gianluca Radicioni,Alexandra Eichhorst,Simon Kirste,Tanja Sprave,Nils Henrik Nicolay,Stefan Fichtner-Feigl,Robert Thimme,Rolf Wiehle,Thomas B. Brunner,Anca-Ligia Grosu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1427332
IF: 4.7
2024-10-03
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Introduction: To evaluate the outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced primary liver cancer. Materials and methods: Patients with locally advanced liver cancer unsuitable for other loco-regional treatments were treated with SBRT with 50–60 Gy in 3–12 fractions in two consecutive prospective trials. Results: A total of 83 patients were included, of whom 14 were excluded, leaving 69 evaluable patients with 74 treated lesions. A total of 50 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 11 patients had cholangiocarcinoma (CCC). Approximately 76% had a Child-Pugh (CP) score of A, while 54% had an albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score of 1. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 11 months, and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months. The ALBI score was an important predictor of overall survival (HR 2.094, p = 0.001), which remained significant also in the multivariate analysis. Patients with an ALBI grade of ≥1 had an OS of 4 months versus 23 months in patients with an ALBI grade of 1 (p ≤ 0.001). The local control at 1 and 2 years was 91%. Thirteen patients developed grade ≥ 3 toxicities, of whom nine patients experienced liver toxicities. Patients with a higher ALBI score had a high risk for developing hepatic failure (OR 6.136, p = 0.006). Discussion: SBRT is a very effective treatment with low toxicity and should be considered as a local treatment option in patients with HCC and CCC. Patients with a higher ALBI grade are at risk for developing toxicities after SBRT and have a significantly lower survival rate.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?