Abstract 3826: Predictive and prognostic factors in NUT carcinoma: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Sameeha K. Abdulwali,Abduljalil M. El-Sibai,Saad S. Ali,Abdulaziz M. Alaklabi,Hytham M. Abdalla,Ahmad N. Sabbah,Areez Shafqat,Nader A. Fawzy,Belal N. Sabbah,Ahmed Badran,Tarek Z. Arabi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-3826
IF: 11.2
2024-03-24
Cancer Research
Abstract:Background: NUT carcinoma (NC) is a rare cancer affecting midline structures and involving the lung, bones, and lymph nodes. Data on NC are limited mostly to case reports and case series. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched for original articles describing confirmed NC patients. A quantitative individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) analyzing overall survival and risk factors for progression was performed for all NC patients with a clear age at diagnosis. Relevant patient characteristics and clinical parameters were compared in a multivariate Cox regression model. Findings: Out of 4,701 studies screened, 175 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. 117 (66.9%) were case reports. 284 patients were included in the IPD-MA. 139 (48.9%) patients were male, 145 (51.1%) underwent surgery, 156 (54.9%) received radiotherapy, and 173 (60.9%) developed metastasis. The mean age at diagnosis was 35.82±18.33 and the median OS was 9 months. 77 (27.1%) patients received platinum-based agents, 39 (13.7%) received taxanes, and 15 (5.3%) received BET inhibitors as part of their first-line regiment. Age at diagnosis, gender, and the aforementioned drugs did not significantly influence OS. Presence of metastasis was an independent predictor of poor survival, while radiotherapy and surgery were significantly associated with better survival (table 1). Interpretation: NC is associated with poor survival. Surgery and radiotherapy appear to be more effective treatment strategies, while medical modalities may not play a major role in the treatment of NC. Predictors of overall survival in NUT carcinoma patients. Parameter Hazard ratio 95% confidence interval P-value Age at diagnosis 0.99 0.99-1 0.35 BET inhibitors 0.61 0.28-1.15 0.16 Platinum-based agents 0.73 0.47-1.13 0.16 Taxanes 1.29 0.78-2.1 0.31 Surgery 0.41 0.29-0.58 <0.0001 Female gender 1.12 0.83-1.51 0.45 Metastasis 1.76 1.26-2.49 0.0011 Radiotherapy 0.48 0.36-0.67 <0.0001 Citation Format: Sameeha K. Abdulwali, Abduljalil M. El-Sibai, Saad S. Ali, Abdulaziz M. Alaklabi, Hytham M. Abdalla, Ahmad N. Sabbah, Areez Shafqat, Nader A. Fawzy, Belal N. Sabbah, Ahmed Badran, Tarek Z. Arabi. Predictive and prognostic factors in NUT carcinoma: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular s); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl) nr 3826.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?