Abstract:The global financial markets have experienced a significant development with the emergence of the notions of "sustainable development" and "green investing". This development involves the integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) information into investment decisions. A significant advancement in the worldwide financial market is the integration of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) data into investing choices. ESG ratings have emerged as a significant benchmark for investors in this scenario. However, there is now a considerable disparity in the rating outcomes provided by various rating agencies for particular companies. This disparity distorts the ratings and thus triggers exaggerated reactions from investors. This study investigates the influence of differences in ESG ratings on investor sentiment and its underlying mechanism using a sample of businesses listed on the A-share market in Shanghai and Shenzhen between 2015 and 2022. Research has shown that when there is a significant difference in ESG ratings, it has a detrimental effect on investor sentiment. This means that when there is a large divergence in ESG ratings, it negatively affects investor sentiment, leading to a decrease in their evaluation and confidence in the company. Empirical investigations demonstrate that the focus and consideration given by analysts and research reports play a crucial role in how differences in ESG ratings impact investor sentiment. Additional investigation reveals that the adoption of GRI standards and the verification of ESG reports by third-party entities can somewhat reduce the influence of divergence on the fluctuation of investor mood, as well as enhance investor acknowledgment of revealed information. The paper examines the influence of disagreement in ESG ratings on investor mood, contributes to existing research on ESG ratings dispute, and presents empirical evidence to support the development of China's ESG ratings system and the establishment of a "rational" investment market.

Ripple effect of ESG sentiment: How news stirs the waves in China's A-share market

Quantifying the effect of ESG-related news on Chinese stock movements

The Effect of ESG News on the Chinese Stock Market

An Analysis of the Influence of ESG Rating Divergence on Investor Sentiment

The Effect of International Media News on the Global Stock Market

Does investor sentiment enhance the impact of ESG ratings on firms' financial performance? Evidence from China

The ESG rating, spillover of ESG ratings, and stock return: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

News-based ESG sentiment and stock price crash risk

Has ESG Performance Reduced Stock Price Volatility

How does ESG performance affect stock returns? Empirical evidence from listed companies in China

ESG and Stock Price Volatility Risk: Evidence from Chinese A-share Market

The impact of ESG rating changes on fund shareholding

Effects of investor sentiment on stock volatility: new evidences from multi-source data in China's green stock markets

The Impact of ESG Ratings on Stock Liquidity Risk: Evidence from the Chinese Market

Effects of Investor Sentiment on Stock Volatility: New Evidences from Multi-Source Data in China’s Green Stock Markets

Does ESG performance and investor attention affect stock volatility? An empirical study based on panel data and mixed - frequency data

Can good ESG performance of listed companies reduce abnormal stock price volatility? Mediation effects based on investor attention

The effect of online environmental news on green industry stocks: The mediating role of investor sentiment

Sustainability and stability: Will ESG investment reduce the return and volatility spillover effects across the Chinese financial market?

Influence of ESG Performance on Fund's Propensity to Hold Shares -Empirical Evidence from China's A-share Listed Enterprises

Sustainability reporting and investor sentiment. A sustainable development approach to Chinese-listed firms.