Abstract:Importance: Several state Medicaid agencies have transitioned from traditional fee-for-service to a value-centric alternative payment model (APM) to reimburse federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Little is known about the effects of this shift on FQHC performance. Objective: To assess the association between APMs and the clinical performance, payer mix, risk profile, and financial sustainability of FQHCs. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study was performed in 684 FQHCs (representing 37 states plus the District of Columbia) that continuously operated between January 2009 and December 2021. Data on payer mix (eg, type of insurance) and risk profile (eg, proportion of patients with chronic conditions) of FQHC patients were obtained from the Uniform Data System, and clinic-level financial data (eg, revenue) were obtained from Internal Revenue Service form 990 tax documents. Data were analyzed between November 2022 and October 2023. Exposure: Initial rollout of a value-based payment model (ie, an APM) for FQHCs, as offered by state Medicaid program, between January 2013 and December 2021. Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were 4 audited process measures of health care quality (cervical and colorectal cancer screening and body mass index [BMI] assessment for adults and children) and 2 intermediate health outcome measures (hypertension control and diabetes control). A difference-in-differences design was used with staggered implementation comparing FQHCs before and after the initial APM rollout vs contemporaneous changes in FQHCs in states without APMs. Results: A total of 684 FQHCs (8892 FQHC-years) that served 17 823 959 patients in 2021 (57.3% female) were included in the study. Among FQHCs in states implementing APMs, significant differential increases in 3 of the 4 process quality measures were observed compared with FQHCs in states that did not implement an APM: colorectal cancer screening (3.24 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, 1.40-5.08 pp), adult BMI (3.19 pp; 95% CI, 0.70-5.68 pp), and child BMI (4.50 pp; 95% CI, 1.83-7.17 pp). There were also modest differential improvements in blood pressure control for individuals with hypertension (1.02 pp; 95% CI, 0.04-2.00 pp) and blood glucose control for individuals with type 2 diabetes (1.02 pp; 95% CI, 0.02-2.02 pp) compared with FQHCs in states without an APM. There was no evidence that the APM rollout was associated with clinics selecting healthier patients (-0.01 pp; 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.19 pp) or stinting on care (-0.02 visits; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.04 visits). Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, introduction of Medicaid APM options for FQHCs was associated with modest, statistically significant increases in quality concentrated among FQHCs with APM models that explicitly incentivized quality. This finding suggests that APMs can be both a financially viable and a health-promoting model for reimbursement in the health care safety net.

Mental health care use and quality among Medicaid adults with serious mental illness receiving care at Federally Qualified Health Centers vs. other settings

Health center use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 2012-2018

Utilization, quality, and spending for pediatric Medicaid enrollees with primary care in health centers vs non-health centers

National and State-Level Trends in Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Services at Federally Qualified Health Centers, 2012-2019

Factors associated with federally qualified health center financial performance

Access to Federally Qualified Health Centers and Emergency Department Use among Uninsured and Medicaid‐insured Adults: California, 2005 to 2013

Alternative Payment Models and Performance in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Primary care utilization and clinical quality performance: a comparison between health centres in Medicaid expansion states and non-expansion states

340B Participation and Safety Net Engagement Among Federally Qualified Health Centers

Health Needs, Utilization of Services and Access to Care among Medicaid and Uninsured Patients with Chronic Disease in Health Centres.

Are disparities in mental health care for Medicaid beneficiaries lower in managed care?

Federally Qualified Health Center Penetration Associated With Reduced Community COVID-19 Mortality in Four United States Cities

Mental health care provision in community health centers and hospital emergency department utilization

Child mental health treatment access and retention in integrated primary care and traditional outpatient services

Mental health services in managed care: quality questions remain

Health Care Spending, Use, and Financial Hardship among Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Enrollees with Mental Health Symptoms

Variation in outpatient mental health service utilization under capitation

Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition and Clinical Performance in Us Community Health Centers

Antipsychotic medication adherence and preventive diabetes screening in Medicaid enrollees with serious mental illness: an analysis of real-world administrative data

Urban Rural Differences on Accessing Patient Centered Medical Home Among Children With Mental/Developmental Health Conditions/Disorders

The Effect of Medicaid Eligibility on Utilization of Services and Access to Care among Health Center Patients: A Regression Discontinuity Design