The EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet: Impact on Cardiovascular Disease and the Environment in the EPIC Cohort
Chiara Colizzi,Joline WJ Beulens,Reina E Vellinga,Krasimira Aleksandrova,Christina C Dahm,Inge Huybrechts,Timothy J Key,Jessica E Laine,Keren Papier,Paolo Vineis,Elisabete Weiderpass,Claudia Agnoli,Jeoren Berden,Paolo Chiodini,Jytte Halkjær,Alicia Heath,Verena Katzke,Giovanna Masala,Olatz Mokoroa,Conchi Moreno-Iribas,Genevieve Nicolas,Daniele Rodriguez-Palacios,Carlotta Sacerdote,Maria-Jose Sanchez,Matthias B Schulze,Anne Tjonneland,W.M.Monique Verschuren,Yvonne T van der Schouw
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.17.24309022
2024-06-17
Abstract:Background: Diet plays an important role in the development of cardiovascular diseases and in maintaining sustainable planetary boundaries. The EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet could potentially provide co-benefits for human and environmental health, yet evidence on the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet and risk of cardiovascular events and environmental impact is limited.
Methods: We investigated the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke risk, and with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, land use, and dietary species richness (DSR). We included 364,745 adult men and women participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Food frequency questionnaires were used to create a score reflecting adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet (EAT-Lancet diet-score), ranging from 0 (no adherence) to 140 (complete adherence). A (pro-) vegetarian version of the score, the EAT-Lancet dietVV-score, was also created, which rewarded low to no consumption of all animal-based foods. Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to study the association of adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet with CHD and stroke incidence. Linear regression analyzed the association with GHG emissions, land use, and DSR.
Findings: Over a median follow-up of 12.8 years, we identified 12,690 CHD and 7,088 stroke cases. After multivariable adjustment, those most adherent to the EAT-Lancet diet had lower risk of incident stroke (HRQ5vsQ1: 0.59, 95%CI = 0.54 to 0.64), and of incident CHD for those younger than 60 years old at baseline (HRQ5vsQ1: 0.86, 95%CI = 0.79 to 0.93). High adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet reduced GHG emissions by 1.7% (95%CI = -1.9 to -1.5) and land use by 6.2% (95%CI = -6.4 to -5.9). The EAT-Lancet dietVV-score further reduced GHG emissions and land use by 14.3% (95%CI= -14.5 to -14.0) and 18.8% (95%CI = -19.0 to -18.5), respectively, when comparing extreme quintiles, while hazard ratios for CHD and stroke remained unchanged. Those most adherent to the EAT-Lancet diet consumed 16.1% (95%CI = 15.9 to 16.4) more plant species and 19.7% (95%CI = -20.11 to -19.40) fewer animal species.
Interpretation: Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was associated with co-benefits for both cardiovascular outcomes and environmental indicators, including dietary species richness. Lower GHG emissions and land use were achieved by further reducing consumption of animal-based products.
Funding: The coordination of EPIC-Europe is financially supported by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and also by the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London which has additional infrastructure support provided by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). Exposure indicators were calculated with financial support of the Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds (WKOF), as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International grant programme (IIG_FULL_2020_034).
Public and Global Health