Abstract:The quest to answer the longstanding question of how safe is safe enough has led to an evolution of design philosophies. The traditional philosophy has been based on ensuring that system capacity exceeds demand. This philosophy has been manifested in such design methods as allowable stress design (ASD) and load and resistance factor design (LRFD). The level of safety in these methods is commonly calibrated to the acceptable practice using structural reliability methods. Such an approach to design aims to balance life safety and construction costs and works relatively well for service loads under which strength is nearly always a sufficient representative of system capacity. Under extreme loads, however, not only do factors such as ductility or energy-dissipation capacity come into play, but also the consequences of failure are vastly larger and may go beyond the failure site. For this reason, the more modern design philosophy of performance-based design emerged. According to this philosophy, a system is designed to meet a target performance, defined by limits on its performance metrics. These metrics were initially defined on structural responses, such as deformations and accelerations, and later evolved into risk measures based on monetary loss, downtime, and casualties. This philosophy is gradually making its way into modern design codes. Typical performance-based criteria focus primarily on what transpires during extreme loads. The need to incorporate the recovery of the system after such events has prompted the design philosophy to make another leap into resilience-based design (RBD). Resilience is defined herein as the ability to recover, within a predetermined period of time, in the aftermath of extreme events. Resilience transcends risk, i.e., a resilience analysis incorporates not only a risk analysis but also a recovery analysis. This paper provides a review of RBD in continuation of PBD and further introduces various applications of RBD into the design and assessment of civil infrastructure. The review covers the state of the art in resilience quantification approaches and associated computational platforms.

Moving toward resilience and sustainability in the built environment

Special issue on adaptive planning for sustainable and resilient infrastructure i: an introduction

Role of cultural heritage in promoting the resilience of linear/critical infrastructure system with the enhancement of economic dimension of resilience: a critical review

Resilience of critical structures, infrastructures and communities

The Sustainability and Resilience of Infrastructure: Critical Review and Prospects

Towards Unifying Resilience and Sustainability for Transportation Infrastructure Systems: Conceptual Framework, Critical Indicators, and Research Needs

Performance-based Engineering to Achieve Community Resilience

Resilience in multilayer transportation infrastructure networks: a review and conceptual framework for equity-based assessment

Interpreting sustainability and resilience in the built environment

Resilience in Infrastructure Systems: A Comprehensive Review

A Novel Resilience Assessment Framework for Multi-component Critical Infrastructure

PEOPLES: A Framework for Evaluating Resilience

Expanding horizons: a framework for developing futures-oriented resilience in the built environment

Developing an integrated framework to quantify resilience of urban systems against disasters

Green infrastructure development: Strategies for urban resilience and sustainability

Resiliency and Recoverability of Concrete Structures

Resilience-Based Design of Infrastructure: Review of Models, Methodologies, and Computational Tools

A review of emerging strategies for incorporating climate change considerations into infrastructure planning, design, and decision making

Sustainable Resilience in Urban Land Use

From Performance to Resilience-Based Design of Structures - Keynote Lecture

Resilience framework for urban water supply systems planning