Recent infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 in donors was associated with a higher incidence of acute graft‐versus‐host disease in recipients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Fan Lin,Lanping Xu,Tingting Han,Zhengli Xu,Jing Liu,Yun He,Yao Chen,Huan Chen,Wei Han,Yuhong Chen,Haixia Fu,Yuanyuan Zhang,Xiaodong Mo,Fengrong Wang,Jingzhi Wang,Yifei Cheng,Chenhua Yan,Hui Sun,Yu Wang,Xiaohui Zhang,Xiaojun Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19594
2024-06-26
British Journal of Haematology
Abstract:The global pandemic has made SARS‐CoV‐2 infection common in the population. In the post‐pandemic era, it is imperative to understand the influence of donor SARS‐CoV‐2 infection on outcomes after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This retrospective analysis revealed that grafts from donors with mild SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or early recovery stage (Donor group 1) contained a higher dose of NK cells. Transplants using donor group 1 led to significantly higher incidences of acute graft‐versus‐host disease. While transplants from donors with different SARS‐CoV‐2 infection status had comparable primary engraftment and survival rates. Summary The global pandemic has resulted in the common occurrence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the population. In the post‐pandemic era, it is imperative to understand the influence of donor SARS‐CoV‐2 infection on outcomes after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). We retrospectively analysed allo‐HSCTs from donors with mild SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or early recovery stage (ERS) (group 1, n = 65) and late recovery stage (group 2, n = 120). Additionally, we included allo‐HSCT from donors without prior SARS‐CoV‐2 infection as group 0 (n = 194). Transplants from donors with different SARS‐CoV‐2 infection status had comparable primary engraftment and survival rates. However, group 1 had higher incidences of acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGvHD), grade II–IV (41.5% vs. 28.1% in group 0 [p = 0.014] and 30.6% in group 2 [p = 0.067]) and grade III–IV (22.2% vs. 9.6% [p = 0.004] in group 0 and 12.2% in group 2 [p = 0.049]). Conversely, the risk of aGvHD in group 2 was similar to that in group 0 (p > 0.5). Multivariable analysis identified group 1 associated with grade II–IV (hazard ratio [HR] 2.307, p = 0.010) and grade III–IV (HR 2.962, p = 0.001) aGvHD, which yielded no significant risk factors for survival. In conclusion, we preliminarily demonstrated donors in the active infection state or ERS of mild SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were associated with higher incidences of aGvHD in transplants from related donors.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?