Virtual reality‐based therapy after anterior cruciate ligament injury effectively reduces pain and improves knee function, movement patterns, and dynamic balance: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Irene Cortés‐Pérez,Jose María Desdentado‐Guillem,María Soledad Camacho‐Delgado,María del Rocío Ibancos‐Losada,Esteban Obrero‐Gaitán,Rafael Lomas‐Vega
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12477
2024-09-21
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Abstract:Effectiveness of virtual reality‐based therapy in the rehabilitation of the anterior cruciate ligament injury. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Purpose Virtual reality‐based therapy (VRBT) may be an effective physical therapy complement employed in the rehabilitation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of VRBT in improving pain, knee function, strength, proprioception, flexion range of motion (ROM), and dynamic balance after ACL injury. Methods We conducted this systematic review with meta‐analysis following PRISMA criteria. Since inception to June 2024, we searched in PubMed Medline, WOS, SCOPUS, CINAHL and PEDro without publication date and language restrictions. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), comprising only patients with ACL injury, that assess the effectiveness of VRBT compared to classical interventions on the outcomes of interest were included. PEDro scale was employed to analyze the methodological quality of the RCTs included. Cohen's standardised mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to calculate the pooled effect in meta‐analyses. Results Nine RCTs, providing data from 330 participants (26.96 ± 3.11 years, 85% males) were included. The RCTs included showed good methodological quality (PEDro scale = 6.88 points), being, performance and detection biases, the most common biases reported. Meta‐analyses showed that VRBT was more effective than classical interventions in reducing pain (SMD = −1.15; 95% CI −1.85 to −0.45; p = 0.001; I2 = 0%), and increasing knee function (SMD = 1.71; 95% CI 0.93 to 2.5; p
surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?