A comparison of isolated limb infusion/perfusion, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and intralesional therapy as first‐line treatment for patients with melanoma in‐transit metastases
Danielle K. DePalo,Michelle M. Dugan,Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi,David W. Ollila,Tina J. Hieken,Matthew S. Block,Winan J. van Houdt,Michel W. J. M. Wouters,Sophie J. M. Reijers,Nethanel Asher,Kristy K. Broman,Zoey Duncan,Matilda Anderson,David E. Gyorki,Hayden Snow,Jenny Held,Jeffrey M. Farma,John T. Vetto,Jane Y. C. Hui,Madison Kolbow,Robyn P. M. Saw,Serigne N. Lo,Georgina V. Long,John F. Thompson,Youngchul Kim,Lilit Karapetyan,Lars Ny,Alexander C. J. van Akkooi,Roger Olofsson Bagge,Jonathan S. Zager
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35636
IF: 6.9209
2024-11-11
Cancer
Abstract:Background Isolated limb infusion and perfusion (ILI/ILP) has been a mainstay treatment for unresectable melanoma in‐transit metastases (ITM), but increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional therapy (talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC]) introduced several different management options. This study compares first‐line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC. Methods Retrospective review from 12 international institutions included patients treated from 1990 to 2022 with first‐line ILI/ILP, ICI, or TVEC for unresectable melanoma ITM. Results A total of 551 patients were treated, with ILI/ILP (n = 356), ICI (n = 125), and TVEC (n = 70) with median follow‐up of 5.5 years. Tumor burden was highest with ILI/ILP and lowest with TVEC (p = .002). Breslow thickness was lowest with TVEC (p = .007). TVEC was mostly used in stage IIIB disease versus IIIC for ILI/ILP and ICI (p = .01). Using ICI as the reference category, TVEC had the highest odds of a complete response (CR) (odds ratio, 1.96; p = .029) and a longer local progression‐free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; p = .003). ILI/ILP had shorter local PFS (HR, 1.72; p = .012), PFS (HR, 1.79; p
oncology