Ola Ahmed,Maria Bernadette Majella Doyle,Marwan S Abouljoud,Diane Alonso,Ramesh Batra,Kenneth L Brayman,Diane Brockmeier,Robert M Cannon,Kenneth Chavin,Aaron M Delman,Derek A DuBay,Jan Finn,Jonathan A Fridell,Barry S Friedman,Danielle M Fritze,Derek Ginos,David S Goldberg,Glenn A Halff,Seth J Karp,Vivek K Kohli,Sean C Kumer,Alan Langnas,Jayme E Locke,Daniel Maluf,Raphael P H Meier,Alejandro Mejia,Shaheed Merani,David C Mulligan,Bobby Nibuhanupudy,Madhukar S Patel,Shawn J Pelletier,Shimul A Shah,Parsia A Vagefi,Rodrigo Vianna,Gazi B Zibari,Teresa J Shafer,Susan L Orloff

Abstract:Importance: A new liver allocation policy was implemented by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in February 2020 with the stated intent of improving access to liver transplant (LT). There are growing concerns nationally regarding the implications this new system may have on LT costs, as well as access to a chance for LT, which have not been captured at a multicenter level. Objective: To characterize LT volume and cost changes across the US and within specific center groups and demographics after the policy implementation. Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study collected and reviewed LT volume from multiple centers across the US and cost data with attention to 8 specific center demographics. Two separate 12-month eras were compared, before and after the new UNOS allocation policy: March 4, 2019, to March 4, 2020, and March 5, 2020, to March 5, 2021. Data analysis was performed from May to December 2022. Main outcomes and measures: Center volume, changes in cost. Results: A total of 22 of 68 centers responded comparing 1948 LTs before the policy change and 1837 LTs postpolicy, resulting in a 6% volume decrease. Transplants using local donations after brain death decreased 54% (P < .001) while imported donations after brain death increased 133% (P = .003). Imported fly-outs and dry runs increased 163% (median, 19; range, 1-75, vs 50, range, 2-91; P = .009) and 33% (median, 3; range, 0-16, vs 7, range, 0-24; P = .02). Overall hospital costs increased 10.9% to a total of $46 360 176 (P = .94) for participating centers. There was a 77% fly-out cost increase postpolicy ($10 600 234; P = .03). On subanalysis, centers with decreased LT volume postpolicy observed higher overall hospital costs ($41 720 365; P = .048), and specifically, a 122% cost increase for liver imports ($6 508 480; P = .002). Transplant centers from low-income states showed a significant increase in hospital (12%) and import (94%) costs. Centers serving populations with larger proportions of racial and ethnic minority candidates and specifically Black candidates significantly increased costs by more than 90% for imported livers, fly-outs, and dry runs despite lower LT volume. Similarly, costs increased significantly (>100%) for fly-outs and dry runs in centers from worse-performing health systems. Conclusions and relevance: Based on this large multicenter effort and contrary to current assumptions, the new liver distribution system appears to place a disproportionate burden on populations of the current LT community who already experience disparities in health care. The continuous allocation policies being promoted by UNOS could make the situation even worse.

Reducing Hospital Length of Stay and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis Rates for Children Receiving a Liver Transplant: A Single‐Center Experience From 2000 to 2021

Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

Perioperative Management of Pediatric Combined Heart and Liver Transplantation: A 17 year single center experience

Perioperative Complications After Pediatric Liver Transplantation—A Retrospective Analysis of 421 Cases

Demonstrating the Non-inferiority of a Plastic Surgery Microscopic Technique for Hepatic Artery Anastomosis in Pediatric Liver Transplant: A Single-Institution Study

Tailoring allocation policies and improving access to paediatric liver transplantation over a 16-year period

Liver transplantation for biliary atresia: A nationwide investigation from 1996 to 2013 in mainland China.

Developments in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Since Implementation of the New Allocation Rules in Eurotransplant

Related factors associated with the prognosis of children undergoing liver transplantation under the enhanced recovery after surgery nursing concept

Split Liver Transplantation and Pediatric Waitlist Mortality in the United States: Potential for Improvement

Outcome of Pediatric-to-adult Liver Transplantation:A Single-Center Study in China

Pediatric Combined Heart-liver Transplantation: A Single-center Long-term Experience

Impact of Prolonged Ischemic Time on Pediatric Heart Transplantation Outcomes: Improved Outcomes in the Most Recent Era

Incidence, management and outcomes in hepatic artery complications after paediatric liver transplantation: protocol of the retrospective, international, multicentre HEPATIC Registry

Optimizing pediatric liver transplantation: Evaluating the impact of donor age and graft type on patient survival outcome

Biliary atresia and liver transplantation in the United States: A contemporary analysis

Identifying drivers of cost in pediatric Liver Transplantation

Liver Transplantation in Children with Urea Cycle Disorders: The Importance of Minimizing Waiting Time

Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation for biliary atresia and results of policy changes: over 20 years of follow-up experience

Utilization of immediate extubation in a multidisciplinary pathway for pediatric liver transplantation associated with improved postoperative outcomes

Liver Transplant Costs and Activity After United Network for Organ Sharing Allocation Policy Changes