Abstract:The bullwhip effect-the amplification of order variability from the downstream to the upstream stages in a multi-stage supply chain incurs significant consequence in supply chain management.Most of current works addressing the bullwhip effect focus on two-stage supply chains and assume the information distortion will be amplified in the upstream stages.However,whether the amplification effect will exist in the upstream and how it transfers deserve more investigation.Moreover,most bullwhip literature regard the actual inventory in the warehouse the same as the inventory record in the IT system.Nevertheless recent studies have reported that inventory inaccuracy is widespread and severe in industry.Therefore,it is the intent of this paper to extend the study of the bullwhip effect to multi-stages with consideration of inventory inaccuracy. This paper considers a decentralized K-stage serial supply chain with the external demand following the auto-correlated AR(1) process.We assume each stage suffers from inventory inaccuracy due to internal/external theft,unsalables,etc,which is normally distributed.It is further assumed that the supply chain follows an order-up-to policy and all the information is not shared among different parties.Based on this model setting,we build analytical inventory models to obtain the optimal order decisions in two scenarios:(1) inventory inaccuracy exists in the supply chain;(2) inventory inaccuracy is eliminated through advanced technology(such as RFID).Based on the order decisions,the bullwhip effect can be quantified in the form of order variance and the impacts of inventory inaccuracy on the bullwhip effect can then be analyzed. Our analytical and numerical results show several managerial insights.First of all,both the correlation effect of the external demand and the inventory inaccuracy in the supply chain can cause the bullwhip effect.The impacts of the two factors on the bullwhip effect is positively related,therefore the inventory inaccuracy further deteriorates the bullwhip effect.Moreover,the information distortion due to inventory inaccuracy only depends on the variance of the inventory errors,rather than the mean of the errors.It implies that if the amount of the inventory error is huge but its fluctuation is limited,the information distortion will not be substantial.Second,the variability of the external demand and inventory inaccuracy in each stage will be transferred through the order making process up the stream and will be amplified by compounding with the correlation factor of the external demand respectively.Furthermore,the information distortions due to inventory errors of all the downstream stages are accumulated in the upstream stages,resulting in exponential amplification of order variability in the upstream stages,which is more salient when inventory inaccuracy exists. Moreover,we investigate the counter-approach for the bullwhip effect with a focus on the impacts of information sharing.We assume each stage knows not only the external demand,but also the inventory errors in all its downstream stages.Therefore,the decision makers can take advantage of those shared information when forecasting the future demand in order to achieve a better decision.Based on our analytical models and numerical study,it is shown that information sharing will attenuate the bullwhip effect due to inventory errors and reduce the propagation magnitude of the information distortion.The amplification effect reduces from exponential to linear.Consequently,information sharing contributes more when inventory errors present. To this end,understanding how the external and internal information variability affects the bullwhip effect plays a key role for practitioners to make better decisions for supply chain management.

Can Institutional Investor-Manager Interactions Mitigate the Bullwhip Effect? Evidence from China

Coping with the Bullwhip Effect Using Inventory or Cash: an Environment-Behavior-Performance Paradigm

Can Common Institutional Investors in Supply Chains Decode the Bullwhip Effect? Evidence From Order Backlog Mispricing

Bullwhip Effect and Supply Chain Costs with Low- and High-Quality Information on Inventory Shrinkage

The Impacts of Inventory Inaccuracy on the Bullwhip Effect in a Multi-stage Supply Chain

The Cause and Countermeasure of the Bullwhip Effect Explained in the Economics

Forward or backward: The Impact of Vertical Integration Direction on the bullwhip effect

The bullwhip effect in the supply chain and the corresponding solution

The impact of institutional pressures on supplier integration and financial performance: Evidence from China

Can High-Quality Interactions Reduce the Regulatory Inquiries Received by Firms? Evidence from Interactive Investor Platforms in China

The bullwhip effect and credit default swap market: A study based on firm-specific bullwhip effect measure

Inhibitory influence of supply chain digital transformation on bullwhip effect feedback difference

Investor–firm interactions and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China

Blessing or Curse? The Bullwhip Effect of an Omni-Channel Supply Chain with Channel Interactions

Bullwhip Effect and Assess of the Information Sharing under ARIMA(0, 1,1)Demand

Do Institutional Investors Aggravate the Instability of Stock Markets:Evidence from Shanghai A-Share Market

Does common institutional ownership mitigate hold‐up problems along the supply chain?

More online interaction, more stock liquidity:--Evidence from Chinese stock exchange online interaction platform

The Impact of Risk Aversion on the Value of Information Sharing to Dampening the Bullwhip Effect

The Impact of Bullwhip Effect on the Supply Chain Performance With the Mediating Effect of Information Sharing Among an Enterprise and Suppliers

Bullwhip Effect of Supply Networks: Joint Impact of Network Structure and Market Demand