Jury remains out on decline of non-avian dinosaurs

Luíseach Nic Eoin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02427-3
IF: 19.1
2024-05-14
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Abstract:In recent years there has been considerable interest in determining whether dinosaurs were in decline in the run up to the asteroid impact that probably caused their mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous period, 66 million years ago. Although birds (a dinosaur subclade) survived into the ensuing Palaeogene, non-avian dinosaurs were wiped out. Environmental changes and trophic restructuring have been put forward as possible causes may have underlain a potential decline before the asteroid impact, but other studies suggest there was no such decline. The key questions are how intact the fossil record is and how the gaps in it are filled. Writing in Cambridge Prisms: Extinction , Allen et al. take a Bayesian phylodynamic modelling approach to the question by looking at 16 phylogenies using two alternative models with different approaches to sampling information and to modelling changes in the number of species through time. One model returns a declining-diversity result, but the other fails to do so — this indicates that model design differences have a marked effect on diversification estimates. In other words, using the phylogenies currently available, it is not possible to definitively show whether or not dinosaurs were in decline prior to the end-Cretaceous event. The authors argue that only more densely sampled and accurate fossil timetrees, as well as models that capture more information about the quality of the dinosaur fossil record, will allow for a definitive answer. Original reference: Cambridge Prisms: Extinction , https://doi.org/10.1017/ext.2024.5 (2024)
ecology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?