The role of chest X-ray in the diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review concerning low-resource birth scenarios

Gabriela Silveira Neves,Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis,Roberta Maia de Castro Romanelli,Jannine dos Santos Nascimento,André Dias Sanglard,James Batchelor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2338633

IF: 2.996

2024-04-26

Global Health Action

Abstract:Background Access to diagnostic tools like chest radiography (CXR) is challenging in resource-limited areas. Despite reduced reliance on CXR due to the need for quick clinical decisions, its usage remains prevalent in the approach to neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS).

public, environmental & occupational health

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is the role and necessity of chest X-ray (CXR) in the diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) in resource-limited obstetric settings. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the role of CXR in diagnosing and grading the severity of NRDS, compared to current clinical features and laboratory standards.

### Main Research Background:
- **NRDS** is a common neonatal disease and one of the leading causes of death in children under 5 years old globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).
- **Resource limitations**: In resource-limited areas, access to diagnostic tools like CXR is very difficult. Although clinical decisions need to be made quickly, CXR remains an important tool in managing NRDS.
- **Diagnostic methods**: Current diagnostics include evaluating medical records, clinical symptoms, radiological findings, and blood gas analysis.

### Research Objectives:
- **Evaluate the role of CXR**: Assess the effectiveness of CXR in diagnosing and grading the severity of NRDS.
- **Compare other diagnostic methods**: Compare CXR with other clinical features and laboratory standards to evaluate its necessity and possible alternatives in resource-limited settings.

### Methods:
- **Systematic review**: The research team conducted a literature search in six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science, Cochrane) to identify studies that meet the NRDS diagnostic criteria.
- **Data extraction**: Independent reviewers screened the studies, and senior reviewers resolved discrepancies. Data were organized into descriptive tables highlighting clinical indicators of CXR and NRDS.

### Results:
- **Study selection**: Out of 1,686 screened articles, 23 were selected, involving 2,245 neonates.
- **Use of CXR**: All selected studies used CXR to diagnose NRDS, with 91% of the studies using it to assess disease severity.
- **Importance of CXR**: 7 studies (30%) indicated that CXR is irreplaceable in NRDS diagnosis, while 10 studies (43%) found that other methods surpassed CXR in certain aspects, such as severity assessment, monitoring progress, and predicting the need for surfactant therapy.

### Conclusion:
- **Importance of CXR**: Although CXR remains important in scientific reports, the study results suggest that its actual clinical application in resource-limited areas may not fully reflect current global practices.
- **Global health impact**: The study results emphasize the importance of developing guidelines to reduce unnecessary ionizing radiation exposure while ensuring timely access to critical clinical information to provide appropriate neonatal care.

### Impact on Global Health Policy and Action:
- **Guideline development**: There is a need to develop guidelines to optimize the use of CXR, reduce unnecessary radiation exposure, and ensure timely access to critical clinical information.
- **Resource allocation**: In resource-limited settings, more support and training are needed to improve the quality of early NRDS management, thereby reducing neonatal mortality.