Switching from acetate to citrate dialysate in a central concentrate delivery system for high-volume online hemodiafiltration: a retrospective cohort study

Jee Young Lee Ki Sung Kim Hyun Jin Cho Yoosun Joo Yong-Jeong Lee Jung-Hwan Park Young-Il Jo a Division of Nephrology,Department of Internal Medicine,Konkuk University Medical Center,Konkuk University School of Medicine,Seoul,Republic of Koreab Division of Nephrology,Department of Internal Medicine,Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong,Seoul,Republic of Koreac Dialysis Center,Konkuk University Medical Center,Seoul,Republic of Korea
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022x.2024.2398709
IF: 3.222
2024-09-10
Renal Failure
Abstract:Interest in citrate-based dialysate (Cit-D) is growing due to its benefits, including anticoagulation and dialysis efficacy. However, research on safety and efficiency of Cit-D in high-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) via central concentrate delivery system (CCDS) is scarce. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Cit-D when switching from acetate-based dialysate (Acet-D) in high-volume HDF via CCDS. This is a retrospective analysis of 28 patients who underwent post-dilution online HDF via CCDS, who switched from Acet-D to Cit-D. The study period was divided into 3 periods for analysis: 12 weeks using Acet-D (AD period), the first 12 weeks using Cit-D (CD-1 period), and the second 12 weeks using Cit-D (CD-2 period). We collected the laboratory, dialysis, and safety parameters in each period from electrical medical records. After switching from Acet-D to Cit-D, heparin dosage decreased by 17%, whereas the incidence of complications did not increase. Kt/V BUN and urea reduction ratio increased by 4.6% and 2.1%, respectively. Pre-dialysis beta 2 -microglobulin concentration decreased after using Cit-D. The corrected calcium levels decreased in the CD-1 period compared to the AD period, but in CD-2, they subsequently increased to levels similar to those observed during the AD period. Symptomatic hypocalcemia did not occur, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of hyperparathyroidism. Endotoxin levels and the bacterial culture of ultrapure dialysate were unremarkable throughout all periods. These results might suggest that Cit-D could potentially offer advantages over Acet-D, such as reducing the heparin dose and increasing dialysis efficiency, in patients undergoing high-volume HDF using CCDS.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?