Abstract:Background Total inhibition of IL-6 or its receptor represents a potent anti-inflammatory therapy with considerable side effects. Selective targeting IL-6 trans-signalling may have safety advantages that differentiates it from current pan-IL-6 inhibitors. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of olamkicept, a soluble gp130-Fc fusion protein that binds to the IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor complex, as induction therapy for active ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods This multi-national, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (NCT03235752) enrolled patients with active UC (full Mayo score ≥5, rectal bleeding (RB) score ≥1, endoscopy score (ES) ≥2) with an inadequate response to at least conventional therapy, in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either placebo, olamkicept 300 mg or 600 mg biweekly for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response (decrease in Mayo score from baseline ≥3 and ≥30%, including RB ≤1 or RB decrease ≥1) at week 12. Secondary endpoints were mucosal healing (ES 0 or 1) and clinical remission (Mayo score ≤2, with no subscore >1 and RB=0). The efficacy endpoints were analysed by logistic regression. All p-values were 2-sided without adjustment for multiplicity. Results Of 91 treated patients (30 in placebo, 31 in olamkicept 300 mg group and 30 in 600 mg group), 88 patients (29:30:29) were evaluable for efficacy. Baseline disease and demographic characteristics were similar among the groups (Table 1). Most patients (94.5%) were bio-naïve. The percentage of patients achieving clinical response at week 12 was significantly greater for olamkicept 600 mg than placebo (58.6% vs 34.5%, P=0.032). Clinical remission at week 12 occurred in 0% (placebo), 6.7% (olamkicept 300 mg) and 20.7% (olamkicept 600 mg, P<0.001) of patients. Mucosal healing at week 12 occurred in 3.4%, 10% and 34.5% (P<0.001) of patients, respectively (Figure 1). Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar across the groups. The most common TEAEs included upper respiratory tract infection, increased AST levels, and increased urine bilirubin levels, which were mild to moderate and mostly transient. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 6.7%, 3.2% and 3.3% of patients, respectively. There were no deaths, or other severe AEs associated with current IL-6 inhibitors, such as perforations, severe infections, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Conclusion Biweekly 600 mg olamkicept induction therapy demonstrated clinical efficacy with respect to achieving clinical response, clinical remission and mucosal healing in patients with active UC. Olamkicept was well tolerated with a favourable safety profile. The positive results of this phase 2 study support further development of olamkicept in IBD.

S13 RO7790121 as Treatment for Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Efficacy and Health-Related Quality of Life Improvements: Results from the Phase IIb TUSCANY-2 Trial

OP03 Efficacy and safety of the oral selective sphingosine-1-phosphate-1 receptor modulator VTX002 in moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

S744 QUASAR Induction Study 1 Cumulative Response to Guselkumab in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

P862 Effects of induction and maintenance therapy with risankizumab on health-related quality of life outcomes in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: A post-hoc analysis of Phase 2b/3 trials

Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule Therapies in Improving Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

DOP01 Efficacy and Safety of the IL-6 Trans-Signalling Inhibitor Olamkicept: a Phase 2 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

DOP49 Guselkumab improves health-related quality of life as measured by PROMIS-29 in patients with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: Phase 3 QUASAR induction study

Anti-IP-10 antibody (BMS-936557) for ulcerative colitis: a phase II randomised study

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes With Etrasimod Treatment in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data From ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12

Real-World Effectiveness of Ustekinumab in Ulcerative Colitis in a United States Multicenter Cohort Consortium

P658 Safety and efficacy of MH002, an optimized live biotherapeutic product, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a first-in-disease, double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Induction of Methionine Adenosyltransferase in Rat Liver by Corticosteroids∗

DOP76 Individual and comprehensive symptom resolution after induction and maintenance therapy with risankizumab in patients with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: A post-hoc analysis of INSPIRE and COMMAND studies

S1472 Efficacy of Risankizumab Maintenance Therapy by Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Improvement Status in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Post Hoc Analysis of the COMMAND Phase 3 Study

Early and Sustained Symptom Control with Mirikizumab in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in the Phase 3 LUCENT Programme

A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Two Patient Management Strategies in Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis—The OPTIMISE Study

Add-on multiple submucosal injections of the RNA oligonucleotide GUT-1 to anti-TNF antibody treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: an open-label, proof-of concept study

OP06 Risankizumab Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Efficacy and Safety in the Randomised Phase 3 COMMAND Study

S1080 Corticosteroid-Free Remission Through 3 Years of Upadacitinib Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Data From the Phase 3 Long-Term Extension Study U-ACTIVATE

P847 Effectiveness of tofacitinib in ulcerative proctitis compared to left sided colitis and pancolitis

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with sotorasib and panitumumab (pmab) versus trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) or regorafenib (rego) in CodeBreaK 300.