Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging vs. clinical evaluation of enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis

Zi-Kang Guo,Yi-Meng Zhang,Chun-Yu Kong,Yang Liu,Xiao-Dong Ji,Ying Zhan,Wu-Fang Qi,Xin-Wei Lei,Zi-Kang Guo,Yi-Meng Zhang,Chun-Yu Kong,Yang Liu,Xiao-Dong Ji,Ying Zhan,Wu-Fang Qi,Xin-Wei Lei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001813
IF: 6.133
2021-10-13
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:To the Editor: Enthesitis is an inflammation of the iliac attachment of ligaments or tendons, which may be among the first symptoms of spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is a unique characteristic of SpA which can differentiate it from rheumatoid arthritis. In spondyloarthropathies, peripheral enthesitis precedes joint symptoms and is associated with a higher degree of erosive disease. Four methods are available for evaluation of enthesitis, including tenderness, conventional radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, over 100 entheses are found in the human body. The aforementioned four methods can detect only local enthesitis. Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is a novel approach that allows visualization of the entire body in one examination, but has lower image resolution than conventional MRI.[1] Recent studies have explored the application of WB-MRI. However, real-world data are lacking, and most of them are limited to psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In the present study, the distribution pattern of enthesitis was explored in patients with SpA using WB-MRI in real world set. The result was compared with that of other clinical instruments used to evaluate enthesitis.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?