Abstract:The increase in remote hearings after the COVID‐19 pandemic presents an urgent need to examine how judges assess video‐mediated witness and party statements compared with live statements. There is currently a limited body of research on this subject. As for the assessment itself, professionals within the judicial system sometimes believe they can detect deception based on visible cues such as body language and emotional expression. Research has, however, shown that lies cannot be detected based on such cues. The Finnish Supreme Court has also given rulings in accordance with the scientific literature. In this study, we used a survey to investigate how much importance a Finnish sample of district judges (N = 47) gave to several variables pertaining to the statement or the statement giver, such as body language and emotional expression. We also investigated the association between the judges' beliefs about the relevance of body language and emotional expression and their preference for live statements or statements via videoconference. The judges reported giving more importance to body language and emotional expression than legal psychology research and Finnish Supreme Court rulings would call for. Our results also indicated that there was a slight bias to assess live statements more favorably than statements given via videoconference, as well as a slight bias in favor of the injured party. More effort must be put into making judges and Supreme Courts aware of findings in legal psychology to avoid biases based on intuitive reasoning where it is contrary to scientific evidence.

The Influence of "Body Language" on the Assessment of Witness Credibility in Australian Written Court Judgments

The use of nonverbal communication when assessing witness credibility: a view from the bench

The detection of deception during trials: Ignoring the nonverbal communication of witnesses is not the solution—A response to Vrij and Turgeon (2018)

Body Language Detecting Deception

Finnish district judges' assessments of live versus video‐mediated party statements in court

Narrative Style and Witness Testimony

Dressing the part: The influence of police attire on outcomes in a simulated traffic violation case

How Does Courtroom Broadcasting Influence Public Confidence in Justice? The Mediation Effect of Vicarious Interpersonal Treatment

Will the law come running? The potential role of "brain fingerprinting" in crime investigation and adjudication in Australia

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

Administration of Justice and Multimodality in Media: Semiotic Translation, Conflict and Compatibility

Deciphering Emoji Variation in Courts: a Social Semiotic Perspective

Interrogation questions to native and non‐native eyewitnesses: The role of witness credibility

Demonstrative Evidence and the Use of Algorithms in Jury Trials

Affective Computing on Speeches of Court Defense Lawyer

Judges in the Lab: No Precedent Effects, No Common/Civil Law Differences

The Role of Emotion and Motivation in Jury Decision-Making

Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom

Source Credibility and the Language of Expert Testimony1

The Symbolic Life of Courts: How Judicial Language, Actions, and Objects Legitimize Credibility Assessments of Asylum Appeals