Abstract WP161: Characterizing the Underlying Microangiopathy of Deep Cerebellar Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Alvin S Das,Avia Abramovitz Fouks,Elif Gokcal,Ofer Rotschild,Marco Pasi,Robert W Regenhardt,Joshua N Goldstein,Anand Viswanathan,Jonathan Rosand,Steven Greenberg,Edip M Gurol
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.wp161
IF: 10.17
2024-02-01
Stroke
Abstract:Introduction: Superficial (gray matter, vermis) cerebellar intracerebral hemorrhage (cICH) is associated with strictly lobar supratentorial cerebral microbleeds—a strong marker for cerebral amyloid angiopathy. However, for deep (white matter, deep nuclei, cerebellar peduncle) cICH, it is unclear whether hypertensive cerebral small vessel disease (HTN-cSVD) is the underlying microangiopathy. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), a marker for hypertensive end-organ damage, and non-hemorrhagic imaging markers of HTN-cSVD such as peri-basal ganglia (BG) white matter hyperintensity (WMH) pattern, deep lacunes, and severe BG enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) would be associated with deep vs. superficial cICH. Methods: Brain MRI scans from a prospective database of consecutive non-traumatic ICH patients admitted to a single referral center (2003 to 2019) were analyzed for the presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and non-hemorrhagic neuroimaging markers. The presence of clinical risk factors, LVH, and neuroimaging markers were compared between patients with deep and superficial cICH in univariate and multivariable models. Results: Of 1,791 patients with spontaneous ICH, 129 (7%) were found to have cICH (mean age 73±12 years, 46% female). Of these, 83 (64%) patients had deep cICH and 46 (36%) patients had superficial cICH. Hypertension (94% vs. 67%, p < 0.01) and LVH (60% vs. 28%, p < 0.01) were more common among patients with deep vs. superficial cICH. Among those who received a brain MRI (74%), the frequency of peri-BG WMH pattern (24% vs. 5%, p = 0.02), deep lacunes (59% vs. 14%, p < 0.01), severe BG EPVS (27% vs. 3%, p < 0.01), deep CMBs (51% vs. 16%, p < 0.01), and mixed location CMBs (37% vs. 11%, p < 0.01) was greater among patients with deep cICH compared to superficial cICH. When these variables were entered into a multivariable regression model, LVH (OR 3.10, 95% CI [1.07-8.97], p = 0.04) and deep lacunes (OR 4.38, 95% CI [1.25-15.31], p = 0.02) remained significantly associated with deep cICH. Conclusions: Because supratentorial HTN-cSVD imaging markers are common in deep cICH, and deep lacunes and LVH are independently associated with deep cICH, it is likely that HTN-cSVD is the underlying microangiopathy of deep cICH.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?