Abstract:Objective: During the past decade, the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been developed in an attempt to minimize recurrence for right-sided colon cancer. This study aims to compare outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME for right-sided colon cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter propensity score matching study. From July 2016 to July 2021, 382 consecutive patients from different Chinese surgical departments were available for inclusion out of an initial cohort of 412, who underwent robotic or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME. Data of all patients were retrospectively collected and reviewed. Of these, 149 cases were performed by a robotic approach, while the other 233 cases were done by laparoscopy. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare perioperative, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes between the robotic and the laparoscopic groups ( n = 142). Results: Before propensity score matching, there were no statistical differences regarding the sex, history of abdominal surgery, body mass index (BMI), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, tumor location, and center between groups ( p > 0.05), while a significant difference was observed regarding age ( p = 0.029). After matching, two comparable groups of 142 cases were obtained with equivalent patient characteristics ( p > 0.05). Blood loss, time to oral intake, return of bowel function, length of stay, and complications were not different between groups ( p > 0.05). The robotic group showed a significantly lower conversion rate (0% vs . 4.2%, p = 0.03), but a longer operative time (200.9 min vs . 182.3 min, p < 0.001) and a higher total hospital cost (85,016 RMB vs . 58,266 RMB, p < 0.001) compared with the laparoscopic group. The number of harvested lymph nodes was comparable (20.4 vs . 20.5, p = 0.861). Incidence of complications, mortality, and pathologic outcomes were similar between groups ( p > 0.05). The 2-year disease-free survival rates were 84.9% and 87.1% ( p = 0.679), and the overall survival rates between groups were 83.8% and 80.7% ( p = 0.943). Conclusion: Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis, the outcomes of robotic right hemicolectomy with CME were comparable to the laparoscopic procedures with fewer conversions to open surgery. More clinical advantages of the robotic surgery system need to be further confirmed by well-conducted randomized clinical trials with large cohorts of patients.

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) versus open extended cholecystectomy: A multicenter propensity score matched study

Clinical Outcomes Between a Minimally Invasive and Open Extended Cholecystectomy for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Oncologic safety of robotic extended cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer

Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision: a retrospective multicenter study with propensity score matching

Early Outcomes of Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Evolution from laparoscopic to robotic radical resection for gallbladder cancer: a propensity score-matched comparative study

Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis

Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program comparative analysis

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Right and Extended Right Hepatectomy

ROBOtic Care Outcomes Project for acute gallbladder pathology

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes after Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score-Matching Study

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review

Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study

Short- and long-term comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with BMI≥30 kg/m2: A propensity score matched analysis

Comparison of early surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection reported by a busy district general hospital in England

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients

Minimally Invasive Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open)

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Early-Stage Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Mastering the Learning Curve: A Multicenter Data-Based Matched Study