Abstract:The concept of learning has multiple interpretations, ranging from acquiring knowledge or skills to constructing meaning and social development. Machine Learning (ML) is considered a branch of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and develops algorithms that can learn from data and generalize their judgment to new observations by exploiting primarily statistical methods. The new millennium has seen the proliferation of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), a formalism able to reach extraordinary achievements in complex problems such as computer vision and natural language recognition. In particular, designers claim that this formalism has a strong resemblance to the way the biological neurons operate. This work argues that although ML has a mathematical/statistical foundation, it cannot be strictly regarded as a science, at least from a methodological perspective. The main reason is that ML algorithms have notable prediction power although they cannot necessarily provide a causal explanation about the achieved predictions. For example, an ANN could be trained on a large dataset of consumer financial information to predict creditworthiness. The model takes into account various factors like income, credit history, debt, spending patterns, and more. It then outputs a credit score or a decision on credit approval. However, the complex and multi-layered nature of the neural network makes it almost impossible to understand which specific factors or combinations of factors the model is using to arrive at its decision. This lack of transparency can be problematic, especially if the model denies credit and the applicant wants to know the specific reasons for the denial. The model's "black box" nature means it cannot provide a clear explanation or breakdown of how it weighed the various factors in its decision-making process. Secondly, this work rejects the belief that a machine can simply learn from data, either in supervised or unsupervised mode, just by applying statistical methods. The process of learning is much more complex, as it requires the full comprehension of a learned ability or skill. In this sense, further ML advancements, such as reinforcement learning and imitation learning denote encouraging similarities to similar cognitive skills used in human learning.

Machine Learning as a Model for Cultural Learning: Teaching an Algorithm What it Means to be Fat

(Machine) Learning to Be Like Thee? For Algorithm Education, Not Training

From Bytes to Biases: Investigating the Cultural Self-Perception of Large Language Models

Analysis of English Cultural Teaching Model Based on Machine Learning

The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddings

Mutual benefits of social learning and algorithmic mediation for cumulative culture

Disembodied Machine Learning: On the Illusion of Objectivity in NLP

Using Machine Learning to Learn Machines: A Cross-Cultural Study of Users’ Responses to Machine-Generated Artworks

On the genealogy of machine learning datasets: A critical history of ImageNet

Using Machine Learning to Guide Cognitive Modeling: A Case Study in Moral Reasoning

The Silent Curriculum: How Does LLM Monoculture Shape Educational Content and Its Accessibility?

Toward Cultural Interpretability: A Linguistic Anthropological Framework for Describing and Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs)

The Thick Machine: Anthropological AI between explanation and explication

Improving Ethical Outcomes with Machine-in-the-Loop: Broadening Human Understanding of Data Annotations

The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research

Studying large language models as compression algorithms for human culture

The Challenges of Machine Learning: A Critical Review

Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes

Machine Culture

Beyond Model Interpretability: Socio-Structural Explanations in Machine Learning

Statistical Modeling: The Three Cultures