More knee reinjuries after ACL reconstruction compared to nonsurgical treatment of the ACL. A 2‐year follow‐up of the NACOX prospective cohort study

Anna S. Selin,Håkan Gauffin,Henrik Hedevik,Anne Fältström,Joanna Kvist
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12473
2024-10-05
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Abstract:Purpose To describe knee reinjuries and surgeries within 2 years after an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, in patients treated with or without ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Methods Two years follow‐up of 275 patients (52% females, mean age 25.2 [SD 7.0] years) about knee reinjuries and surgeries were analysed from the prospective NACOX cohort study, aiming to describe recovery after an acute ACL injury treated according to clinical routine. Knee reinjury was defined as increase or new symptoms due to new trauma. At 2 years after injury, 169 (61%) had undergone an ACLR. Results are presented with descriptive statistics and risk ratios (RR). Results Thirty‐two patients sustained reinjuries within 2 years; 6 in the non‐ACLR group, and 26 in the ACLR group (7 before and 19 after ACLR). Twelve patients in the ACLR group sustained a graft rupture and three did an ACL revision. Patients with non‐ACLR, aged 21–25 years, had a 5.9‐fold higher risk for reinjury than those aged 15–20 years (RR 5.9 [1.3–26.9]; p = 0.012). Twenty‐four patients had surgery in the non‐ACLR group and 36 patients in the ACLR group (excluding primary ACLR), where six were before ACLR and 30 were after ACLR. Conclusion Twelve percent sustained a knee reinjury and 21% underwent knee surgery within 2 years after the index ACL injury. There was a higher reinjury incidence in the ACLR group, but no difference in incidence of surgeries. Thus, ACLR did not reduce the risk of traumatic reinjuries or surgeries, which is important for treatment decision considerations. Level of Evidence Level I.
surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?