From convergence insufficiency to functional reorganization: A longitudinal randomized controlled trial of treatment‐induced connectivity plasticity

Farzin Hajebrahimi,Ayushi Sangoi,Mitchell Scheiman,Elio Santos,Suril Gohel,Tara L. Alvarez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.70007
2024-08-29
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Abstract:Office‐based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy, but not placebo therapy, improves the resting‐state functional connectivity in the regions of the oculomotor vergence network which is correlated with the improvements in the clinical measures using in the assessment and diagnosis of CI. Introduction Convergence Insufficiency (CI) is the most prevalent oculomotor dysfunction of binocular vision that negatively impacts quality of life when performing visual near tasks. Decreased resting‐state functional connectivity (RSFC) is reported in the CI participants compared to binocularly normal control participants. Studies report that therapeutic interventions such as office‐based vergence and accommodative therapy (OBVAT) can improve CI participants' clinical signs, visual symptoms, and task‐related functional activity. However, longitudinal studies investigating the RSFC changes after such treatments in participants with CI have not been conducted. This study aimed to investigate the neural basis of OBVAT using RSFC in CI participants compared to the placebo treatment to understand how OBVAT improves visual function and symptoms. Methods A total of 51 CI participants between 18 and 35 years of age were included in the study and randomly allocated to receive either 12 one‐hour sessions of OBVAT or placebo treatment for 6 to 8 weeks (1 to 2 sessions per week). Resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessments were evaluated at baseline and outcome for each treatment group. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was conducted in nine ROIs of the oculomotor vergence network, including the following: cerebellar vermis (CV), frontal eye fields (FEF), supplementary eye fields (SEF), parietal eye fields (PEF), and primary visual cortices (V1). Paired t‐tests assessed RSFC changes in each group. A linear regression analysis was conducted for significant ROI pairs in the group‐level analysis for correlations with clinical measures. Results Paired t‐test results showed increased RSFC in 10 ROI pairs after the OBVAT but not placebo treatment (p
pharmacology & pharmacy,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?