S. Gruber,K. McLaughlin,A. Etkin,Kelene A. Fercho,J. Daniels,E. Dennis,Xi Zhu,M. Sheridan,J. Fitzgerald,R. Bryant,R. Qi,C. Baird,V. Magnotta,J. Théberge,Evan M. Gordon,J. Blackford,T. Jovanović,Pavel Říha,Jennifer S Stevens,A. Gonenç,Philipp Kinzel,Delin Sun,R. Morey,Ye Zhu,Matthew Peverill,D. Hofmann,M. Stein,S. Sponheim,Sheri M. Koopowitz,D. Grupe,P. Thompson,B. Suarez-Jimenez,I. Koerte,M. van Zuiden,Anna R. Hudson,M. Kennis,Jeffrey P. Guenette,S. M. Nelson,Gen Li,Geoffery May,A. Lazarov,N. Fani,M. Debellis,L. Lebois,Orren Ravid,Chiahao Shih,M. Ross,Raluca M. Simons,Li Wang,T. Varkevisser,R. Herringa,A. King,S. Mueller,S. Disner,R. Neufeld,Maurizio Sicorello,Lee A. Baugh,N. Davenport,N. Jahanshad,S. V. van Rooij,S. Bruce,T. V. van Erp,Kyle Choi,J. Krystal,M. Shenton,C. Larson,E. Geuze,A. Sierk,T. deRoon-Cassini,I. Liberzon,W. E. Hage,D. Stein,Meilin Jia-Richards,T. Straube,A. Simmons,Xin Wang,Xiaofu He,M. Densmore,I. Rektor,C. Haswell,G. Lu,Lauren E. Salminen,I. Rosso,Yoo-Ho Kim,S. Winternitz,A. Cotton,J. Simons,Bobak Hosseini,S. Thomopoulos,D. Veltman,Mike Angstadt,R. Vermeiren,M. Kaufman,C. Weis,Kelly A. Sambrook,G. Forster,J. Frijling,Seonjoo Lee,C. Abdallah,Hong Xie,R. Lanius,E. M. O'Leary,K. Ressler,J. Ipser,Y. Quidé,A. Maron-Katz,J. Bomyea,R. Davidson,S. V. D. van der Werff,S. Koch,Z. Cao,S. Zilcha-Mano,A. Huggins,C. Schmahl,K. Phan,B. Olatunji,J. Cisler,Yi-feng Luo,A. Manthey,M. Korgaonkar,Y. Neria,C. Averill,N. J. van der Wee,L. Nawijn,J. Nitschke,M. Olff,J. Herzog,H. Walter,M. Wall

Abstract:Background Current clinical assessments of Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) rely solely on subjective symptoms and experiences reported by the patient, rather than objective biomarkers of the illness. Recent advances in data-driven computational approaches have been helpful in devising tools to objectively diagnose psychiatric disorders. Here we aimed to classify individuals with PTSD versus controls using heterogeneous brain datasets from the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD Working group. Methods We analyzed brain MRI data from 3,527 structural-MRI; 2,502 resting state-fMRI; and 1,953 diffusion-MRI. First, we identified the brain features that best distinguish individuals with PTSD from controls (TEHC and HC) using traditional machine learning methods. Second, we assessed the utility of the denoising variational autoencoder (DVAE) and evaluated its classification performance. Third, we assessed the generalizability and reproducibility of both models using leave-one-site-out cross-validation procedure for each modality. Results We found lower performance in classifying PTSD vs. controls with data from over 20 sites (60% test AUC for s-MRI, 59% for rs-fMRI and 56% for d-MRI), as compared to other studies run on single-site data. The performance increased when classifying PTSD from HC without trauma history across all three modalities (75% AUC). The classification performance remained intact when applying the DVAE framework, which reduced the number of features. Finally, we found that the DVAE framework achieved better generalization to unseen datasets compared with the traditional machine learning frameworks, albeit performance was slightly above chance. Conclusion Our findings highlight the promise offered by machine learning methods for the diagnosis of patients with PTSD. The utility of brain biomarkers across three MRI modalities and the contribution of DVAE models for improving generalizability offers new insights into neural mechanisms involved in PTSD. Significance ⍰ Classifying PTSD from trauma-unexposed healthy controls (HC) using three imaging modalities performed well (∼75% AUC), but performance suffered markedly when classifying PTSD from trauma-exposed healthy controls (TEHC) using three imaging modalities (∼60% AUC). ⍰ Using deep learning for feature reduction (denoising variational auto-encoder; DVAE) dramatically reduced the number of features with no concomitant performance degradation. ⍰ Utilizing denoising variational autoencoder (DVAE) models improves generalizability across heterogeneous multi-site data compared with the traditional machine learning frameworks

Interpretable Deep Learning for Neuroimaging-Based Diagnostic Classification

Supervised machine learning for diagnostic classification from large-scale neuroimaging datasets

Interpretability of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Neuroimaging

Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Traumatic Brain Injury Detection and NIRIS Grading on Non-Contrast CT: a Multi-Reader Study with Promising Results and Opportunities for Improvement.

Interpretable Deep Neural Networks for Single-Trial EEG Classification

Deep Learning based Diagnosis of PTSD using 3D-CNN and resting-state fMRI data

Applications of interpretable deep learning in neuroimaging: a comprehensive review

Exploiting Dimensionality Reduction and Neural Network Techniques for the Development of Expert Brain-Computer Interfaces

Looking deeper into interpretable deep learning in neuroimaging: a comprehensive survey

Improving Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks in Medical Diagnosis by Investigating the Individual Units

Interpretable Learning Approaches in Resting-State Functional Connectivity Analysis: the Case of Autism Spectrum Disorder

Multimodal Imaging-Based Classification of PTSD Using Data-Driven Computational Approaches: A Multisite Big Data Study from the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD Consortium

Interpreting Brain Biomarkers: Challenges and solutions in interpreting machine learning-based predictive neuroimaging

3D CNN for neuropsychiatry: Predicting Autism with interpretable Deep Learning applied to minimally preprocessed structural MRI data

Explainable AI for Autism Diagnosis: Identifying Critical Brain Regions Using fMRI Data

Toward Transparent AI for Neurological Disorders: A Feature Extraction and Relevance Analysis Framework

Interpretable Graph Neural Networks for Connectome-Based Brain Disorder Analysis

Using deep learning to classify pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder at the individual level

Classifying heterogeneous presentations of PTSD via the default mode, central executive, and salience networks with machine learning

Illuminating the Black Box: Interpreting Deep Neural Network Models for Psychiatric Research

Development and validation of an interpretable deep learning framework for Alzheimer's disease classification