Abstract:Background: Hox genes are known to play a key role in shaping the body plan of metazoans. Evolutionary dynamics of these genes is therefore essential in explaining patterns of evolutionary diversity. Among extant sarcopterygians comprising both lobe-finned fishes and tetrapods, our knowledge of the Hox genes and clusters has largely been restricted in several model organisms such as frogs, birds and mammals. Some evolutionary gaps still exist, especially for those groups with derived body morphology or occupying key positions on the tree of life, hindering our understanding of how Hox gene inventory varied along the sarcopterygian lineage.Results: We determined the Hox gene inventory for six sarcopterygian groups: lungfishes, caecilians, salamanders, snakes, turtles and crocodiles by comprehensive PCR survey and genome walking. Variable Hox genes in each of the six sarcopterygian group representatives, compared to the human Hox gene inventory, were further validated for their presence/absence by PCR survey in a number of related species representing a broad evolutionary coverage of the group. Turtles, crocodiles, birds and placental mammals possess the same 39 Hox genes. HoxD12 is absent in snakes, amphibians and probably lungfishes. HoxB13 is lost in frogs and caecilians. Lobe-finned fishes, amphibians and squamate reptiles possess HoxC3. HoxC1 is only present in caecilians and lobe-finned fishes. Similar to coelacanths, lungfishes also possess HoxA14, which is only found in lobe-finned fishes to date. Our Hox gene variation data favor the lungfish-tetrapod, turtle-archosaur and frog-salamander relationships and imply that the loss of HoxD12 is not directly related to digit reduction.Conclusions: Our newly determined Hox inventory data provide a more complete scenario for evolutionary dynamics of Hox genes along the sarcopterygian lineage. Limbless, worm-like caecilians and snakes possess similar Hox gene inventories to animals with less derived body morphology, suggesting changes to their body morphology are likely due to other modifications rather than changes to Hox gene numbers. Furthermore, our results provide basis for future sequencing of the entire Hox clusters of these animals.

Hox and ParaHox genes in Nemertodermatida, a basal bilaterian clade.

Evolutionary plasticity in nematode Hox gene complements and genomic loci arrangement

Mutation of amphioxus Pdx and Cdx demonstrates conserved roles for ParaHox genes in gut, anus and tail patterning

Analysis of central Hox protein types across bilaterian clades: On the origin of central Hox proteins from an Antennapedia/Hox7-like ancestor

Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella

A Phylogenomic Backbone for Acoelomorpha Inferred from Transcriptomic Data

An axial Hox code controls tissue segmentation and body patterning in Nematostella vectensis

Rotiferan Hox genes give new insights into the evolution of metazoan bodyplans

Hox and Wnt pattern the primary body axis of an anthozoan cnidarian before gastrulation

Gene duplications specific to the amphioxus lineage]

Acoel Single-Cell Transcriptomics: Cell Type Analysis of a Deep Branching Bilaterian

Tracing the Evolutionary Origin of Chordate Somites in the Hemichordate Ptychodera flava

Hox genes regulate asexual reproductive behavior and tissue segmentation in adult animals

A General Scenario of Hoxgene Inventory Variation among Major Sarcopterygian Lineages

Expression of Hox Paralog Group 13 Genes in Adult and Developing Megalobrama Amblycephala.

Hox genes and patterning the vertebrate body

Genetic regulation of amphioxus somitogenesis informs the evolution of the vertebrate head mesoderm

Insights into Bilaterian Evolution from Three Spiralian Genomes

Comparative Hox genes expression within the dimorphic annelid Streblospio benedicti reveals patterning variation during development

PARALOGOUS HOX GENES: Function and Regulation

The Acoel nervous system: morphology and development