Abstract:BACKGROUND: Birthweight is the most common and accessible parameter in assessing neonatal perinatal outcomes and in evaluating the intrauterine environment globally. Infants born too large or too small not only may alter the maternal mode of delivery but also may face other long-term disorders, such as metabolic diseases and neurodevelopmental delay. Studies have revealed different growth profiles of large-for-gesta-tional-age and small-for-gestational-age fetuses in singleton pregnancies. However, currently, no research is focused on the growth trajectories of these infants during twin pregnancies, even though they are at a much higher risk of being small for gestational age.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore fetal growth trajectories of large-for-gestational-age and small-for-gestational-age infants in twin pregnancies to provide strategies for fetal growth management. STUDY DESIGN: This was a case-control study of all noncomplicated twin pregnancies delivered after 36 weeks of gestation at the Peking Uni-versity First Hospital between 2012 and 2021. Ultrasound data were recorded every 2 to 4 weeks until delivery. All the infants were divided into large-for-gestational-age, small-for-gestational-age, and appropriate-for-gestational-age groups. Longitudinal fetal growth (estimated fetal weight, abdominal circumference, etc.) was compared among the 3 groups using a linear mixed model, and other maternal and neonatal perinatal outcomes were compared. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to explore optimal biometric parameters and gestational weeks for predicting small-for-gestational-age infants.RESULTS: Here, 797 pregnant patients with 1494 infants were recruited, with 59 small-for-gestational-age infants, 1335 appropriate-for-gestational-age infants, and 200 large-for-gestational-age infants. The mean birthweights were 1985.34+28.34 g in small-for-gesta-tional-age infants, 2662.08+6.60 g in appropriate-for-gestational-age infants, and 3231.24+11.04 g in large-for-gestational-age infants. The estimated fetal weight of the 3 groups differed from each other from week 26, with the small-for-gestational-age fetuses weighing 51.946 g less and the large-for-gestational-age fetuses weighing 35.233 g more than the appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses. This difference increased with gestation; at 39 weeks, the small-for-gestational-age fetuses weighed 707.438 g less and the large-for-gestational-age fetuses weighed 614.182 g more than the appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses (all P<.05). The small-for-gestational-age group had a sig-nificantly higher rate of hospitalization (89.9 %) and jaundice (40.7 %) than the appropriate-for-gestational-age group, whereas the hospitaliza-tion rate in the large-for-gestational-age group was significantly lower than the appropriate-for-gestational-age group (7.5% and 2.5%; all P<.05). The fetal weight of the small-for-gestational-age infants with adverse outcomes remained near the 10th percentile of the reference and fell below the 3rd percentile at 34 weeks of gestation. The esti-mated fetal weight after 30 weeks of gestation had a satisfactory diag-nostic value in predicting small-for-gestational-age infants. At 30, 32, 34, and 36 weeks of gestation, the areas under the curve were 0.829, 0.840, 0.929, and 0.889 respectively. CONCLUSION: The growth patterns of small-for-gestational-age, appropriate-for-gestational-age, and large-for-gestational-age twin fetuses diverged from 26 weeks of gestation and continued to increase until delivery; therefore, closer monitoring is suggested from 26 weeks of gestation for those carrying small fetuses.

Fetal Growth Ultrasound in Obese Patients for the Detection of Growth Abnormalities

Association of maternal obesity with growth of fetal fractional limb volume

Peripartum Prediction of Fetal Weight in Gravidas With Obesity

Fetal abdominal obesity in women with one value abnormality on diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus

Fetal Growth Trajectories of Small/large for Gestational Age Infants in Twin Pregnancies

Gestational weight loss and fetal growth in uncomplicated pregnancies among women with obesity: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Increased Maternal BMI at Time of Delivery Associated with Poor Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Assessment of fetal growth trajectory identifies infants at high risk of perinatal mortality

Are Neonatal Birth Weights Reduced in Low-Risk Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19 during Pregnancy?

Customized versus Population Growth Standards for Morbidity and Mortality Risk Stratification Using Ultrasonographic Fetal Growth Assessment at 22 to 29 Weeks' Gestation

Pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational diabetes mellitus, and gestational weight gain: individual and combined effects on fetal growth

Doppler abnormalities and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with early-onset fetal growth restriction

Accuracy of Antenatal Ultrasound in Predicting Large for Gestational Age Babies: Population Based Cohort Study

Adverse perinatal outcomes related to pregestational obesity or excessive weight gain in pregnancy

Expanded Fetal Growth Restriction Definition Identifies High Proportion of Umbilical Artery Doppler Anomalies

Perinatal Outcomes of Fetuses with Early Growth Restriction, Late Growth Restriction, Small for Gestational Age, and Adequate for Gestational Age

Fetal growth pathology score: a novel ultrasound parameter for individualized assessment of third trimester growth abnormalities

Placental pathology and fetal growth outcomes in pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity

Obstetric and pediatric growth charts for the detection of fetal growth restriction and neonatal adverse outcomes in preterm newborns before 34 weeks of gestation

Outcome‐based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction

Neonatal Outcomes among Fetuses with an Abdominal Circumference <3rd %ile and Estimated Fetal Weight 3rd to 9th %ile Compared to Fetuses with an EFW <3rd %ile