Abstract:Objectives To assess the accuracy and utility of transabdominal sonographic paraumbilical and suprapubic sliding signs in predicting intra‐abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat Cesarean section (CS) and the association of repeat CS with short‐term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods This was a prospective observational study of pregnant women with a history of CS who were scheduled for third‐trimester elective or emergency CS at a tertiary referral and teaching hospital between July 2021 and June 2022. In order to evaluate the role of transabdominal sonographic paraumbilical and suprapubic sliding signs in the prediction of intra‐abdominal adhesions, participants underwent a high‐resolution transabdominal ultrasound scan prior to repeat CS. Free cephalad and caudad gliding of the uterus under the abdominal wall during deep inhalation and exhalation in each area was considered a positive sliding sign, suggesting a low risk of intra‐abdominal adhesions. The absence of such movement was considered a negative sliding sign, suggesting a high risk of intra‐abdominal adhesions. The presence or absence of intra‐abdominal adhesions was then confirmed during surgery by physicians who were blinded to the sonographic sliding‐sign findings. The type of adhesion, structures involved, method of adhesiolysis, incision‐to‐delivery time, 1‐min and 5‐min Apgar scores, maternal and neonatal injury and other short‐term complications were also reported. Results Of 419 women with a history of at least one previous CS who underwent repeat CS, the preoperative sonographic paraumbilical and suprapubic sliding signs were negative in 173 (41.3%) and 178 (42.5%) women, respectively. On repeat CS, 224 (53.5%) women had intra‐abdominal adhesions, of which 165 (39.4%) had dense adhesions and 59 (14.1%) had only filmy adhesions. The sensitivity and specificity of a negative preoperative paraumbilical sliding sign in predicting the presence of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat CS were 94.6% (95% CI, 92.4–96.7%) and 93.3% (95% CI, 90.9–95.7%), respectively. A negative suprapubic sliding sign also showed high sensitivity (95.2% (95% CI, 93.1–97.2%)) and specificity (91.7% (95% CI, 89.1–94.4%)). Additionally, a negative sliding sign at both locations in the same patient had robust sensitivity (90.2% (95% CI, 87.3–93.0%)) and specificity (96.3% (95% CI, 94.5–98.1%)). We found that the risk of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions increased with parity and the number of previous CS. Dense intra‐abdominal adhesions were associated with increased incision‐to‐delivery time, higher risk of maternal bladder injury, intraoperative bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage. Conclusions Dense intra‐abdominal adhesions are common in women with a previous history of CS and are associated with delayed delivery of the neonate and increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes. The transabdominal sonographic paraumbilical and suprapubic sliding signs are robust methods for the accurate preoperative prediction of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions in patients with a history of CS. As the techniques are easy to learn and perform, the sliding sign should be used more widely for triaging patients at high risk of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions for appropriate preoperative planning. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OP07.04: Prediction of vesicouterine adhesions by transvaginal sonographic sliding sign technique

Prediction of vesicouterine adhesions by transvaginal sonographic sliding sign technique: validation study

Transabdominal sonographic sliding signs for preoperative prediction of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat Cesarean delivery

OP17.06: Diagnosing adenomyosis using transvaginal contrast‐enhanced ultrasound: a pilot study

EP24.13: Advancing endometriosis mapping: quantifying sliding sign in transvaginal sonography to identify Pouch of Douglas obliteration

Accuracy of viscera slide detection of abdominal wall adhesions by ultrasound

EP24.15: Step‐by‐step technique to identify the proximal ureter with transvaginal ultrasound

OP03.05: Detection of Vulvar International Tumor Analysis criteria among sonographers in lymph node evaluation: interrater reliability study

EP17.41: Predictive value of sliding sign in preterm birth

EP08.21: Prediction of adverse intrapartum outcomes at 35–37 weeks

Ultrasound diagnostic of intrauterine adhesions: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

EP25.27: Hysterosalpingography and transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy for tubal occlusion: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta‐analysis

OC21.03: Diagnostic accuracy of direct and indirect signs of adenomyosis and interrater reliability: a prospective multicentre study

EP21.04: Prediction of early pregnancy viability in pregnancies of uncertain viability on ultrasound

Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for external cephalic version

OP02.08: Placental volume measurements during the first trimester using artificial intelligence and virtual reality: the Rotterdam periconception cohort

VP05.17: Learning curve for the ultrasound detection of uterosacral ligaments and torus uterinus deep endometriosis: repeatability and reproducibility study

EP21.21: How successful is our department in predicting hydatidiform moles on transvaginal ultrasound?

Preoperative diagnosis of ureteral medial deviations secondary to deep endometriosis using transvaginal ultrasound examinations: Can we predict the need for ureterolysis during laparoscopic surgery?

Ovarian Immobility at Transvaginal Ultrasound: An Important Sonographic Marker for Prediction of Need for Pelvic Sidewall Surgery in Women With Suspected Endometriosis

OP07.05: Artificial intelligence to detect pouch of Douglas obliteration from magnetic resonance imaging by combining unpaired transvaginal ultrasound videos