Sedimentary contamination study in the Great Chao Phraya River watershed, Thailand, using geographically weighted regression

Roshan BhandariWenchao XueShen YuSalvatore G. P. VirdisEkbordin WinijkulAllan Sriratana TabucanonTonni Agustiono KurniawanMonthip Sriratanaa Department of Energy,Environment and Climate Change,School of Environment,Resources and Development,Asian Institute of Technology,Klong Luang,Thailandb Institute of Urban Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xiamen,People's Republic of Chinac Department of Information and Computer Technology,School of Technology,Asian Institute of Technology,Klong Luang,Thailandd Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies,Mahidol University,Nakhon Pathom,Thailande Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems (Xiamen University),Ministry of Education,College of Ecology and the Environment,Xiamen University,Xiamen,People's Republic of Chinaf National Research Council of Thailand,Bangkok,Thailand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2024.2356113
IF: 4.606
2024-05-23
International Journal of Digital Earth
Abstract:This research investigated the spatial variations of heavy metals and nutrients in the sediment of the Great Chao Phraya River network of Thailand using geographically weighted regression (GWR). The performance of GWR in explaining the spatiality of selected contaminants using single and multiple predictors was compared and discussed, and a suitable approach was recommended for sediment study. Extensive explanatory variables, including land use type and topographic, socio-economic, and meteorological indicators were utilized in the geospatial regressions of river sediment contaminants at the sub-catchment scale. In the case of simple regression, GWR outperformed the ordinary least square (OLS) regressions with global R 2 (range 0.34–0.72 for GWR and 0–0.24 for OLS, respectively), over 2-fold of which was derived by OLS. Similar observations were obtained in multiple regressions, where GWR offered global R 2 values between 0.27 and 0.6, higher than those that were provided by OLS (i.e. 0.12–0.44). Furthermore, multiple GWR model presented higher local explanatory power and performance with significantly increased local R 2 (up to 51%) compared with simple GWRs ( p ≤ 0.05). It is recommended to combine the applications of simple and multiple GWR models to understand the effects of selected explanatory predictors on sediment contaminations from different perspectives.
geography, physical,remote sensing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?