Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to estimate the effectiveness of the credit evaluation system using the borrowing data from China’s leading P2P lending platform, Renrendai.com. Design/methodology/approach The current credit valuation systems are classified into the forward-looking mechanism, which judges the borrowers’ credit levels based on their uploaded information, and the backward-looking mechanism, which judges the borrowers’ credit levels based on their historical repayment performance. Probit models and Tobit models are used to examine the effectiveness of credit evaluation mechanisms. Findings The results show that only the “hard” information reflecting borrowers’ credit ability can explain the default risk on the platform under the forward-looking credit evaluation mechanism. The backward-looking credit evaluation mechanism (BCEM) based on the repeated borrowings produces both promise-enhancing and “fishing” incentives and thus fails to explain the default risk, and weakens the effectiveness of forward-looking credit indicators in explaining the default risk because it encourages borrowers to invest in forging forward-looking credit indicators. Additional information such as the interest rate and the repayment periods reveals borrowers’ credit and thus can also be used as a predictor of borrowers’ default risk. Practical implications The findings suggest that current ex ante screening based on the information collected from the borrowers or repeated borrowings is inadequate to control the default risk in P2P lending markets and thus needs be improved. Ex post monitoring and sharing on defaulter’s information should be strengthened to increase the default cost and thus to deter potential bad borrowers. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper classifying the credit evaluation system in online P2P lending market into the forward-looking type and the backward-looking type, which is important since they provide different incentives to borrowers. The paper also investigates and provides evidence on the promise-enhancing and “fishing” incentives of BCEMs.

Fintech lenders and borrowers screening: superior abilities or lax practices?

Fintech, Credit Market Competition, and Bank Asset Quality

How Do Machine Learning and Non-Traditional Data Affect Credit Scoring? New Evidence from a Chinese Fintech Firm

Religiosity, gambling attitudes, and fintech credit adoption

Fintech Credit Risk Assessment for SMEs: Evidence from China

FinTech penetration, charter value, and bank risk-taking

FinTech Credit: A Critical Review of Empirical Research Literature

Mortgage Lending through a FinTech Web Platform. The Roles of Competition, Diversification, and Automation

Does FinTech Innovation Improve Traditional Banks' Efficiency and Risk Measures? A New Methodology and New Machine-Learning-Based Evidence from Patent Filings

Debt Contracts and Financial Intermediation with Costly Screening

Does Fintech affect shadow banking of non-financial firms? Evidence from the entrusted loans

Digital disruptors at the gate. Does FinTech lending affect bank market power and stability?

BigTech Credit Risk Assessment for SMEs

Legal enforcement and fintech credit: International evidence

Fintech, macroprudential policies and bank risk: Evidence from China

Do financial innovations influence bank performance? Evidence from China

Multi-Dimensional Information with Specialized Lenders

Forward Looking Vs Backward Looking

Fintech model performance analysis in credit loans: evidence from China city commercial banks

When Online Lending Meets Real Estate: Examining Investment Decisions in Lending-Based Real Estate Crowdfunding

Does bank FinTech reduce credit risk? Evidence from China