Abstract:Using a sample of seventy-two firms that adopted fresh start reporting upon their emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, I test whether management estimates of fresh start equity values are misstated and whether such misstatements are related to characteristics of individual firms' bankruptcy process. I predict that the reported fresh start value reflects a tension between managerial incentives to promote the acceptance of the plan of reorganization, and incentives to enhance future reported performance. I test whether the tendency to overstate the fresh start equity value is increasing in factors affecting the acceptance of the reorganization plan (i.e., bankruptcy claimants' relative bargaining power) and decreasing in factors affecting postbankruptcy reported performance (i.e., the probability of future losses). I find that, relative to the market value of equity immediately after emergence from Chapter 11, the fresh start equity value is, on average, understated by about 4%. The difference between the fresh start equity value and market value also exhibits significant cross-sectional variation (an average absolute error of 11%). Consistent with my first prediction, the misstatement is increasing in the relative bargaining power of junior claimants. In contrast to my second prediction, the misstatement is also increasing in the likelihood of future reported losses. This result suggests that firms that are more likely to experience postbankruptcy financial distress are more concerned with obtaining acceptance for their plan than with the effects of the fresh start equity value on postbankruptcy performance. Finally, I document that the misstatement in the fresh start equity value is negatively related to whether firms have undergone prepackaged bankruptcies, and positively related to replacement of a prebankruptcy CEO.

Loss underreporting and the auditing role of bank exams

The Effect of Auditing on Promoting Exports: Evidence from Private Firms in Emerging Markets

Auditors under Fire: the Association Between Audit Errors and the Career Setbacks of Individual Auditors

Detecting and Predicting Accounting Irregularities: A Comparison of Commercial and Academic Risk Measures

Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality, The Impact of Business Context on Auditors' Priorities

Exogenous Loss of Analyst Coverage and Choice of Audit Quality

The relationship between financial reporting standards and accounting irregularities: evidence from US banks

Accruals Quality and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Reporting Discretion and the Choice of Fresh Start Values in Companies Emerging from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

Does Bank Monitoring Reduce Corporate Misreporting? Evidence from Foreign Bank Entry in China

The impact of the Fraud Examiners on Fraud Risk Management in Lehman Brothers Inc. in the financial crisis in the United States

A Study on Audit Failures by Certified Public Accounting Firms

The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality

Loans and Lies: Does Bank Monitoring Reduce Corporate Misreporting?

Who Bears the Losses From Audit Failures? Evidence From an Individual Reputational Environment

Municipal Accounting Restatements and Top Financial Manager Turnover

Executives Implicated in Financial Reporting Fraud and Firms' Investment Decisions

Bank market power and financial reporting quality

Stress Tests, Information Disclosure, and Credit Line Runs

Transparency and Model Evolution in Stress Testing

Accounting-Driven Bank Monitoring and Firms' Debt Structure: Evidence from IFRS 9 Adoption