Abstract:Regional seismic fragility assessment of bridge portfolios must address the embedded uncertainties and variations stemming from both the earthquake hazard and bridge attributes (e.g., geometry, material, design detail). To achieve bridge‐specific fragility assessment, multivariate probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDM) have recently been developed that use both the ground motion intensity measure and bridge parameters as inputs. However, explicitly utilizing bridge parameters as inputs requires numerous nonlinear response history analyses (NRHAs). In this situation, the associated computational cost increases exponentially for high‐fidelity bridge models with complex component connectivity and sophisticated material constitutive laws. Moreover, it remains unclear how many analyses are sufficient for the response data and the resulting demand model to cover the entire solution space without overfitting. To deal with these issues, this study integrates Gaussian process regression (GPR) and active learning (AL) into a multistep workflow to achieve efficient regional seismic fragility assessment of bridge portfolios. The GPR relaxes the probability distribution assumptions made in typical cloud analysis‐based PSDMs to enable heteroskedastic nonparametric seismic demand modeling. The AL leverages the varying standard deviation to select the least but most representative bridge‐model‐ground‐motion sample pairs to conduct NRHA with much‐improved efficiency. Both independent and correlated multi‐output GPRs are proposed to deal with bridge portfolios with seismic demand correlations among multiple components (column, bearing, shear key, abutment, unseating, and joint seal). Considering a single benchmark highway bridge class in California as the case study, the AL‐GPR framework and the associated component‐level fragility results are investigated in terms of their efficiency, accuracy, and robustness. The fragility results show that 70 AL‐selected samples would enable the GPR to derive bridge‐specific fragility models comparable to the ones using the multiple stripes analysis approach with 1950 ground motions considered for each individual bridge. The AL‐GPR model also successfully captures the physics of how bridge span length, deck area, column slenderness, and steel reinforcement ratio would change the damage state exceedance probabilities of different bridge components. The efficiency of AL stems from the fact that, with the multi‐output independent GPR, a stable and reliable fragility model can be achieved using 50 AL‐selected samples compared to at least 270 randomly chosen samples. The proposed methodology advances the state of the art in enabling more efficient and reliable regional seismic fragility assessment of multi‐component bridge portfolios.

Pier-bents parameterized seismic fragility analysis for regional simply-supported girder bridges based on multi-layer perceptron structural demand models

Machine Learning-based Seismic Fragility Curves for RC Bridge Piers

Seismic fragility assessment and maintenance management on regional bridges using bayesian multi-parameter estimation

Fragility Analyses of Bridge Structures Using the Logarithmic Piecewise Function-Based Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model

Multi-parameter seismic fragility and sensitivity analysis of long-span cable-stayed bridge based on multi-task lasso regression

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Simply Supported Girder Bridges Resting on Double-Column Piers for High Speed Railway

Seismic fragility assessment framework for highway bridges based on an improved uniform design-response surface model methodology

Enabling efficient regional seismic fragility assessment of multi‐component bridge portfolios through Gaussian process regression and active learning

Seismic Fragility Analysis of LRB-isolated Bridges Considering the Uncertainty of Regional Temperatures Using BP Neural Networks

Probabilistic-based Seismic Fragility Analysis of a Ground-Bridge Structure System Considering Site Liquefaction

Seismic Fragility Analysis of the Reinforced Concrete Continuous Bridge Piers Based onMachine Learning and Symbolic Regression Fusion Algorithms

Convex Model-Based Calculation of Robust Seismic Fragility Curves of Isolated Continuous Girder Bridge

System Fragility Assessment of Tall-Pier Bridges Subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motions

Sensitivity Analysis in Seismic Reliability of an Urban Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge

Seismic Assessment of Medium-Span Concrete Cable-Stayed Bridges Using the Component and System Fragility Functions

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Multispan Continuous Girder Bridges with Varying Pier Heights considering Their Bond-Slip Behavior

Identification of the Most Fragile Component for a Typical RC Bridge Using Seismic Fragility Curves

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridges Considering Different Sources of Uncertainties

Seismic fragility assessment of long-span cable-stayed bridges in China

Fragility assessment of RC bridge piers subjected to vehicle collision based on residual load-bearing capacity