Abstract:Abstract Introduction Chest pain accounts for 8.8% of all presentations to an Hospital Emergency Department. In line with ESC guidelines (2019), an adapted HEART pathway, utilising CT Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) is delivered by our Emergency Cardiology Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANP) and Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS) as part of an ambulatory chest pain pathway. It is our first line diagnostic test for patients with a non-ischaemic 12-lead ECG and normal cardiac biomarkers, with a low-to-intermediate HEART score. Responsibility for the referral of patients onto the pathway is shared with the Cardiology Registrars. This is a collaborative interdisciplinary pathway between Emergency Medicine, Cardiology, and Radiology. Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CTCA as part of an Accelerated Diagnostic Pathway (ADP), for evaluation of chest pain of possible cardiac origin in low-to-intermediate risk chest pain patients. Methods We examined the CTCA and safety outcomes of patients presenting between Jan 1st 2022 – Dec 31st 2023 who were risk stratified as low-to-intermediate risk for coronary artery disease, based on Heart score, 12-lead ECG and biomarker testing, using the electronic patient records. Institutional ethics was in place. Results Between January 1st and December 31st 2022, 290 patients were referred for CTCA, with a total of 268 CTCAs completed. The number of patients referred on the ADP increased by 53.4% in 2023 with 445 being referred for CTCA, 416 of which have been completed, with 12 pending completion. 38% of patients were found to have evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary artery disease causing at least 50% stenosis was identified in 11% of patients. 4.5% of these patients required revascularisation, 17 of whom underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with a further 13 being referred for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. A positive family history was the most dominant risk factor associated with significant CAD. An equivalent number of males to females were referred for CTCA, however, men were more than 7 times more likely to have severe disease. (12% vs 88%). All patients referred for CTCA via the chest pain pathway were followed up by the Emergency Cardiology ANP/CNS in a virtual clinic, delivering risk factor modification advice and preventative therapies, when indicated. There was no evidence of any major adverse cardiovascular events within a 30-day period for this patient cohort. Conclusion The integration of CTCA into an adapted HEART pathway has resulted a safe and timely discharge for patients presenting to ED with acute chest pain, of possible cardiac origin. CTCA offers excellent early detection of coronary artery disease in this patient cohort with normal ECGs and cardiac biomarkers, but with a history of chest pain suggestive of CAD.

Validation of the ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Patients With Chest Pain

Diagnostic accuracy of the HEART Pathway and EDACS-ADP when combined with a 0-hour/1-hour hs-cTnT protocol for assessment of acute chest pain patients

Age differences in the safety and effectiveness of the HEART Pathway accelerated diagnostic protocol for acute chest pain

A Critical Pathway for Management of Patients with Acute Chest Pain Who Are at Low Risk for Myocardial Ischemia: Recommendations and Potential Impact

Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial

Safety and Effectiveness of the High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin HEART Pathway in Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

An analysis of the Association of Society of Chest Pain Centers Accreditation to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction guideline adherence

Performance of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T at 90 days among patients with known coronary artery disease

Evaluating the integration of CTCA as part of an accelerated diagnostic pathway for patients presenting to the Emergency Department with acute chest pain: a two-year review

Simplified Predictive Instrument to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndromes in a High-Risk Population

Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trial

A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain

A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study.

Safety and feasibility of triage and rapid discharge of patients with chest pain from emergency room: A pragmatic, randomized noninferiority control trial of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0 to 1 hour pathway vs conventional 0 to 3 hour accelerated diagnostic protocol

The Impact of American College of Cardiology Chest Pain Center Accreditation on Guideline Recommended Acute Myocardial Infarction Management

Validating the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) and Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) rules for the prediction of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain

Effect of a heart score best practice alert on discharge decisions and outcomes of patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain

Comparison of usual care and the HEART score for effectively and safely discharging patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department: would the score always help?

Identification of chest pain patients appropriate for an emergency department observation unit

Early discharge using single cardiac troponin and copeptin testing in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS): a randomized, controlled clinical process study

A new score for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in acute chest pain with non-diagnostic ECG and normal troponin