Abstract:The increasing pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from buildings has motivated specialists to develop low-carbon products incorporating bio-based materials. The impact of these materials is often evaluated through life-cycle assessment (LCA), but there is no clear consensus on how to model the biogenic carbon released or absorbed during their life-cycle. This study investigates and compares existing methods used for biogenic carbon assessment. The most common approaches were identified through an extensive literature review. The possible discrepancies between the results obtained when adopting different methods are made evident through an LCA study of a timber building. Results identified that land-use and land-use-change (LULUC) impacts and carbon-storage credits are not included in most existing methods. In addition, when limiting the system boundary to certain life-cycle stages, methods using the –1/+1 criterion can lead to net negative results for the global warming (GW) score, failing to provide accurate data to inform decision-making. Deviation between the results obtained from different methods was 16% at the building scale and between 35% and 200% at the component scale. Of all the methods studied, the dynamic approach of evaluating biogenic carbon uptake is the most robust and transparent. Practice relevanceThis critical review identified key methodological differences between the most commonly used methods and recommended standards for biogenic carbon accounting in buildings. This indicates a lack of consensus and guidance for conducting LCAs of bio-based construction products and buildings using bio-based materials. A case study applying four different LCA approaches on a timber building identified the inability to compare results and create proper benchmarks. Moreover, different methods lead designers to pursue different strategies to reduce a building’s carbon footprint. Regulators, the construction industry and the construction products industry are directly affected by this lack of comparability. This research highlights the flaws and benefits of commonly used methods. A clear and grounded recommendation is for practitioners to adopt dynamic biogenic carbon accounting for future assessments of bio-based materials and buildings.

A comprehensive analysis towards benchmarking of life cycle assessment of buildings based on systematic review

Life cycle assessment for carbon emission impact analysis for the renovation of old residential areas

Life cycle assessment for China building environment impacts

Evaluation of the completeness of LCA studies for residential buildings

A REVIEW OF LIFE CYCLE RESEARCH OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT AT DIFFERENCE SCALES: A CITATION ANALYSIS USING BIG DATA

Comparative study of greenhouse gas emission calculations and the environmental impact in the life cycle assessment of buildings in China, Finland, and the United States

Comparing the Standards of Life Cycle Carbon Assessment of Buildings: An Analysis of the Pros and Cons

Evaluation of environmental impact and GHG emission with energy system modeling combined with LCA in building sector: A review

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Building Construction: A Case Study in China

Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: A systematic review

The impact of life cycle assessment database selection on embodied carbon estimation of buildings

Biogenic carbon in buildings: a critical overview of LCA methods

A LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR BUILDINGS

The application of life cycle assessment in buildings: challenges, and directions for future research

International Comparative Study on Building Life-cycle Energy Consumption and CO_2 Emission

Comprehensive assessment of embodied environmental impacts of buildings using normalized environmental impact factors

A REVIEW ON LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS BASED ON BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING

Quantitative Assessment on Carbon Emission of Different Structures in Building Life Cycle

Development of a Carbon Emission Calculations System for Optimizing Building Plan Based on the LCA Framework

Developing a dynamic life cycle assessment framework for buildings through integrating building information modeling and building energy modeling program

A BIM-LCA Approach for Estimating the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Large-Scale Public Buildings: A Case Study