Respiratory‐swallow patterning and oropharyngeal swallowing impairment in patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplant

Kahla Graham,Erin L. Reedy,Jungwha Julia Lee,Elizabeth Spencer Norton,Ambalavanan Arunachalam,Rade Tomic,Bonnie Martin‐Harris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14912
2024-09-04
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Abstract:Swallowing impairment and altered respiratory phase patterning were demonstrated in patients with end‐stage lung disease undergoing lung transplant evaluation. Findings implicate the need for instrumental evaluation of swallowing. Further investigation is needed to better understand how respiratory‐swallow coordination and swallowing safety may be affected by lung transplantation. Background Although swallowing impairment is prevalent following lung transplantation, baseline respiratory and swallowing characteristics are often overlooked. Respiratory disease processes may predispose lung transplant candidates to altered respiratory‐swallow patterning and swallowing impairment. Methods This cross‐sectional study included patients referred for a Modified Barium Swallow Study during lung transplant evaluation. Swallowing impairment was measured using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile and Penetration‐Aspiration Scale. Respiratory plethysmographic signals synchronized with videofluoroscopy were analyzed to determine phase patterning, pause duration, and rate. Mixed‐effects logistic regression was used to identify linkages between respiratory and swallowing measures. Key Results Fifty patients were included and demonstrated delayed swallow initiation (49/50), oral residue (37/50), incomplete pharyngoesophageal segment opening (35/50), and esophageal retention (43/50). Airway invasion occurred infrequently (10/50). Atypical respiratory patterning was significantly associated with impairment in pharyngeal swallow initiation (OR [95% CI] = 1.76 [1.16, 2.68], p = 0.009), laryngeal elevation (OR [95% CI] = 1.45 [1.01, 2.07], p = 0.044), and laryngeal vestibular closure (OR [95% CI] = 2.57 [1.48, 4.46], p
gastroenterology & hepatology,neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?