Employee layoffs in times of crisis: do family firms differ?

Massimo BaùJohan KarlssonKajsa HaagDaniel PittinoFrancesco Chiricoa Centre for Family entrepreneurship and Ownership (CeFEO),Jönköping International Business School – Jönköping University,Jönköping,Swedenb Department of Economics and Statistics – University of Udine,Udine,Italyc Macquarie Business School – Macquarie University,North Ryde,Australia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2309160
IF: 6.408
2024-01-31
Entrepreneurship and Regional Development
Abstract:In this study, we seek to understand firm behaviour during times of crisis, with a particular focus on family firms in different contexts. We theorize that family control mitigates (i.e. negatively moderates) the relationship between economic crisis and the layoff of employees, resulting in a higher propensity of family firms to retain their employees during a crisis compared to their nonfamily counterparts. Furthermore, taking a closer look at family firms, based on their location, we argue that family firms in rural regions are more likely to adopt measures leading to involuntary job turnover than family firms in urban areas due to a higher sensitivity to the loss of socioemotional wealth following a business closure. Relying on a panel dataset of Swedish private firms active in the period 2004–2012, our study contributes to a better understanding of family firms as employers in different contexts.
business,development studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?