Abstract:Importance: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs more commonly among military service members than among civilians; however, despite the availability of several evidence-based treatments, there is a need for more efficient evidence-based PTSD treatments to better address the needs of service members. Written exposure therapy is a brief PTSD intervention that consists of 5 sessions with no between-session assignments, has demonstrated efficacy, and is associated with low treatment dropout rates, but prior randomized clinical trials of this intervention have focused on civilian populations. Objective: To investigate whether the brief intervention, written exposure therapy, is noninferior in the treatment of PTSD vs the more time-intensive cognitive processing therapy among service members diagnosed with PTSD. Design, setting, and participants: The study used a randomized, noninferiority design with a 1:1 randomization allocation. Recruitment for the study took place from August 2016 through October 2020. Participants were active-duty military service members diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder. The study was conducted in an outpatient setting for service members seeking PTSD treatment at military bases in San Antonio or Killeen, Texas. Interventions: Participants received either written exposure therapy, which consisted of 5 weekly sessions, or cognitive processing therapy, which consisted of 12 twice-weekly sessions. Main outcomes and measures: Participants were assessed at baseline and at 10, 20, and 30 weeks after the first treatment session. The primary outcome measure was PTSD symptom severity assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Noninferiority was defined as the difference between the 2 groups being less than the upper bound of the 1-sided 95% CI-specified margin of 10 points on the CAPS-5. Results: Overall, 169 participants were included in the study. Participants were predominantly male (136 [80.5%]), serving in the Army (167 [98.8%]), with a mean (SD) age of 34 (8) years. Eighty-five participants were randomly assigned to written exposure therapy, with 65 (76.5%) completing all treatment sessions, and 84 to cognitive processing therapy, with 47 (54.8%) completing all treatment sessions. Findings indicated that written exposure therapy was noninferior to cognitive processing therapy, with the largest difference in change in outcome between the treatment conditions of 3.96 points on the outcome measure. The 1-sided 95% CI upper limit was less than 10 points across time points in both groups and ranged from 4.59 at week 30 to 6.81 at week 10. Within-condition effect sizes ranged from a Cohen d of 0.48 for the written exposure therapy group in the intention-to-treat analysis at week 10 to 0.95 for the cognitive processing therapy group in the per-protocol analysis at week 10, and between-condition effect size ranged from 0.06 in the intention-to-treat analysis at week 30 to 0.22 in the per-protocol analysis at week 10. Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, support was found for an effective and more efficient PTSD treatment approach for service members. Future research should determine who does and does not benefit from PTSD treatment to best maximize treatment outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03033602.

Exploring the Associations of Emotion Regulation and Trait Resilience with the Efficacy of Cognitive Processing Therapy for Active Duty Military Personnel with PTSD

Examining the associations between posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters across cognitive processing therapy

Cognitive–behavioural conjoint therapy versus prolonged exposure for PTSD in military service members and veterans: results and lessons from a randomized controlled trial

Integrating brief exposure exercises to support cognitive processing therapy for treatment of PTSD: A case study

Emotional processing is not enough: relations among resilience, emotional approach coping, and posttraumatic stress symptoms among combat veterans

The impact of social support, unit cohesion, and trait resilience on PTSD in treatment-seeking military personnel with PTSD: The role of posttraumatic cognitions.

Enhancing resiliency and optimizing readiness in military personnel through psychological flexibility training: design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial

Associations Between Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Deployed Service Members of the German Armed Forces

Predictors of Attrition and Response in Cognitive Processing Therapy for Interpersonal Trauma Survivors with PTSD

State of the Science of Cognitive Processing Therapy

Characterizing PTSD symptom profiles in special forces operators and support personnel: Justification for a Precision Medicine Approach

Treatment-related beliefs and reactions among trauma-focused therapy completers and discontinuers: A qualitative examination.

Effect of Written Exposure Therapy vs Cognitive Processing Therapy on Increasing Treatment Efficiency Among Military Service Members With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Residual posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms following a residential posttraumatic stress disorder treatment program for U.S. active duty service members.

Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies Associated with the DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Criteria.

Effectiveness of Cognitive Processing Therapy and Prolonged Exposure in the Department of Veterans Affairs

A dynamical systems analysis of change in PTSD symptoms, depression symptoms, and suicidal ideation among military personnel during treatment for PTSD

Treatment of military-related post-traumatic stress disorder: challenges, innovations, and the way forward

A Baseline Model of PTSD From the ACES Cohort

Identifying psychological risk and resilience in high-risk military personnel

Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury: Generalization of Prolonged-Exposure PTSD Treatment Outcomes to Postconcussive Symptoms, Cognition, and Self-Efficacy in Veterans and Active Duty Service Members