Abstract:Status pursuit has been emphasized as a key motivational factor underlying narcissism, but research has just begun to unravel the processes by which more narcissistic individuals pursue status in their everyday social interactions. In this article, we combine process models of narcissistic status pursuit with three-factor models of narcissism to test whether different aspects of narcissism (i.e., agentic, antagonistic, and neurotic narcissism) can be characterized by stronger reactivity to different kinds of status perceptions (i.e., the perceived assignment of status, attack on status, and neglect of status). Using data from two experience sampling studies, one involving college students (Nparticipants = 285; Nobservations = 18,036) and one in the general population (Nparticipants = 1,177; Nobservations = 36,074), we first found that the perceived assignment of status, attack on status, and neglect of status were related to status-relevant behaviors (i.e., expressive, combative, and avoidant behaviors) and emotions (e.g., pride, anger, and shame) within persons on average. Next, we found that both mean levels of perceptual, behavioral, and emotional states and status contingencies (i.e., the within-person relationships of status perceptions with behavioral and emotional states) varied considerably across individuals and that these individual differences were reliable and stable across time. Last, we found some associations between trait levels of agentic, antagonistic, and neurotic narcissism and individual differences in mean levels as well as status-emotion contingencies. Our findings emphasize the multifaceted and status-driven nature of narcissism and support the use of theoretically derived contingencies as more dynamic aspects of personality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Are basic psychological needs linked to collective narcissism and secure ingroup identity?

Investigating motivations underlying collective narcissism and in-group identification

Communal Narcissism: Social Decisions and Neurophysiological Reactions

An intergroup approach to collective narcissism: Intergroup threats and hostility in four European Union countries

Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction.

On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle.

The Divergent and Bidirectional Relationships Between Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry and Prosocial Behaviors

Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image

Collective Narcissism and In-Group Satisfaction Predict Opposite Attitudes Toward Refugees via Attribution of Hostility

Psychological need-satisfaction and subjective well-being within social groups.

Yes, we can (but for different reasons): Collective narcissism is linked to different values but similar pro-ingroup collective action tendencies among disadvantaged and advantaged ethnic groups

Predicting psychological need satisfaction and frustration from early maladaptive schemas and DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits

Narcissistic status pursuit in everyday social life: A within-person process approach to the behavioral and emotional dynamics of narcissism.

Psychological Needs and the Facilitation of Integrative Processes

Their own worst enemy? Collective narcissists are willing to conspire against their in-group

Different shades of narcissism at work: The relationships of narcissism dimensions with work-related outcomes

Self-Absorbed and Socially (Network) Engaged: Narcissistic Traits and Social Networking Site Use

Cross‐cultural dynamics of narcissism and prosocial behavior: Unveiling the role of social status pursuit and collectivism

Distress and retaliatory aggression in response to witnessing intergroup exclusion are greater on higher levels of collective narcissism

Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility.

Psychological Needs as Basic Motives, Not Just Experiential Requirements