Abstract:Introduction: The optimal treatment of choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis remains controversial. Common surgical methods vary among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with or without T-tube drainage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of surgical methods and to determine the appropriate procedure for patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2019, a total of 1555 consecutive patients diagnosed with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who underwent surgical treatment in Tongji Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Total 521 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones underwent LC + LCBDE + T-Tube were excluded from the analysis. At last, 1034 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups according to their surgical methods: preoperative ERCP + subsequent LC (ERCP + LC group, n = 275), LC + LCBDE + intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) + primary duct closure (Tri-scope group, n = 479) and LC + laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration (LTCBDE group, n = 280). Clinical records, operative findings and postoperative follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results: There was no mortality in three groups. Common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate was 97.5% in ERCP + LC group, 98.7% in Tri-scope group, and 99.3% in LTCBDE group. There were no difference in terms of demographic characteristics, biochemistry findings and presentations, but the Tri-scope group had the biggest diameter and amount of stones and diameter of CBD, the LTCBDE group had the least CBD stones and the biggest diameter of cystic gall duct (CGD). ERCP + LC group have the longest hospital stay (14.16 ± 3.88 days vs 6.92 ± 1.71 days vs 10.74 ± 5.30 days, P < 0.05), also has the longest operative time than others (126.08 ± 42.79 min vs 92.31 ± 10.26 min, 99.09 ± 8.46 min, P < 0.05). Compared to ERCP + LC group, LTCBDE group and Tri-scope group had lower postoperation-leukocyte, shorter surgery duration and hospital stay (P < 0.05). Compared to the Tri-scope group, the LTCBDE group had the shorter hospital stay, extubation time and operation time and less intraoperative bleeding. There were less postoperative complications in LTCBDE group (1.1%) compared to the ERCP + LC group (3.6%) and Tri-scope group (2.2%). Follow-up time was 6 to 72 months. Four patients in ERCP + LC group and 5 in Tri-scope group reported recurrent stones. Conclusion: All the three surgical methods are safe and effective. Tri-scope approach and LTCBDE approach have superiority to preoperative ERCP + LC. LC + LTCBDE shows priority over Tri-scope approach, but should be performed in selected patients. LC + LCBDE + T-Tube can be an alternative management if the other three procedures were failed. The surgeons should choose the most appropriate surgical procedure according to the preoperative examination results and intraoperative situation.

Simplified single-session EUS-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal for management of choledocholithiasis in patients with surgically altered anatomy

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Suboptimal Specificity of Asge High-Risk Group in Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Choledocholithiasis

Accuracy of ASGE High-Risk Criteria in Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones

Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: a Feasibility and Safety Study in 29 Patients

Repeat ultrasonography and MRCP after the pain had subsided in patients who presented with acute abdomen caused by a single common bile duct stone

[EUS-guided therapy of cholangiolithiasis in surgically altered anatomy of the upper GI tract - a unicenter case study]

One-step percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy in patients with choledocholithiasis

Ultrasound-guided double-tract percutaneous cholecystostomy combined with a choledochoscope for performing cholecystolithotomies in high-risk surgical patients

Laparoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transcystic Approach for the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones

Enhanced recovery after surgery in percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy for patients with hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Clinical analysis of endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

A preliminary study of endoscopic trans-gastric gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy for cholecystolithiasis ( with video)

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic trans-gastric cholecystolithotomy combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis (with video)

Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Traditional Laparoscopic Instruments: a Report of Thirty-Six Cases

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangioscopic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones and Analysis of Risk Factors for Recurrence

Surgical methods of treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis: six years' experience of a single institution

Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Choledochoscopy in the Treatment of Intrahepatic and Common Bile Duct Stones

Single-stage management of choledocholithiasis: intraoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

S4041 Single-Session EUS-Directed Transgastric ERCP and Simultaneous EUS-Guided Transmural Gallbladder Drainage in a Choledocholithiasis and Acute Cholecystitis Patient After Unsuccessful Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Reclaiming the management of common duct stones in acute care surgery