Abstract:Background: Calcium is a predictor of poor outcome in the treatment of infrainguinal arterial disease. Rotational atherectomy can effectively debulk atherosclerotic calcium but is less likely to significantly modify medial and adventitial calcinosis. Shockwave IVL provides circumferential sonic pressure waves capable of disrupting deeper calcium and theoretically complements the debulking process of atherectomy. We present acute and intermediate outcome data from patients with severe femoral or iliac artery calcified disease treated with the combination of rotational atherectomy and Shockwave IVL at a single center. Methods: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data on rotational atherectomy (Jetstream (Boston Scientific) and orbital atherectomy (CSI)) from a single operator at a single center with core laboratory analysis of angiographic imaging. All patients that received the combination treatment of rotational atherectomy and Shockwave IVL were included in this study. Patient follow-up was done from medical records with data extracted by an experienced research coordinator. Primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events including major dissection (NHLBI C or higher), perforation, distal embolization, or major amputation defined as amputation above the ankle. Primary effectiveness endpoint was procedural success (≤ 30% residual at end of procedure). 23/24 (95.8%) patients were treated with drug coated balloons (DCB) post combination therapy. Secondary endpoint on follow-up was target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: A total of 24 patients were included. Mean age was 70.7 ± 9.9 years. Lesions were in the femoropopliteal 79.1%, common femoral 12.5% and iliac 8.3% arteries. 87.0% were claudicants and 58.3% diabetics. Chronic total occlusion was 12.5%, severe calcium 100%, lesion length 84.5 ± 37.1 mm, baseline stenosis 57.1 ± 18.9% and baseline minimal luminal diameter (MLD) 2.2 ± 1.1 mm. Patients were treated with Jetstream (n = 19) or Orbital (n = 5) atherectomy. Embolic filter was used in 58.3% of cases. Post atherectomy stenosis was 36.4 ± 17.5%, post adjunctive IVL 21.1 + 15.7%, and final stenosis 13.0 ± 10.9%. Bailout stenting was 4.6% and primary stenting 13.6% (total stenting rate 18.2%). Final MLD was 4.7 ± 0.8 mm, resulting in an acute gain of 2.5 mm. No infrapopliteal embolization or amputation was noted. At a mean follow up of 591.4 ± 175.2 days, 2 patients died (unrelated to procedure or device). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months occurred in 2 patients or 2/22 (9%). At 18-month of follow up TLR occurred in 7/22 (31%) patients. Conclusion: The combination of atherectomy and shockwave IVL followed by adjunctive DCB is safe and appears to be effective in treating severe calcified disease with acceptable TLR on long term follow-up in a population of severe femoropopliteal disease.

Comparison of patients undergoing protected high risk percutaneous coronary intervention using either intravascular lithotripsy or rotational atherectomy

Comparison Of Rotational Atherectomy And Modified Balloons Prior To Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation For The Treatment Of Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesions

To shock or to drill: comparison of intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy - a meta-analysis

Clinical outcomes following debulking atherectomy of calcified left main coronary lesions: a high-volume centre experience

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring prolonged mechanical circulatory support after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From BMC2

Intravascular Lithotripsy versus Rotational Atherectomy in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: Analysis from the PROGRESS-CTO registry

Lower revascularization rates after high-speed rotational atherectomy compared to modified balloons in calcified coronary lesions: 5-year outcomes of the randomized PREPARE-CALC trial

Percutaneous coronary intervention plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in chronic coronary syndrome: a propensity score-matched analysis from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry

Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy in the Treatment of Calcified Common Femoral Artery Disease

Therapeutic Effect of Rotational Atherectomy with Implantation of Drug Eluting Stent in Heavily Coronary Calcified Patients.

Subanalysis of the PREPARE CS Registry

Impact of the use of plaque modification techniques on coronary microcirculation using an angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance

In-hospital Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Multicentre ROTA-STEMI Network

Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Versus Rotational Atherectomy in an Asian Population: Clinical Outcomes in Real-World Patients

Shockwave™ Lithoplasty in Combination With Atherectomy in Treating Severe Calcified Femoropopliteal and Iliac Artery Disease: A Single-Center Experience

Long-term 5-year outcome of the randomized IMPRESS in severe shock trial: percutaneous mechanical circulatory support vs. intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction

Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions: the STIFF (Stenoses with calcificaTIon treated with angioplasty eFFected with dedicated interventional tools) study

Comparison of Bailout and Planned Rotational Atherectomy for Severe Coronary Calcified Lesions

The Use of Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices for ACS Patients with Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk PCI

Efficacy and safety of shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (S-IVL) in calcified unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention – short-term outcomes