Abstract:Background: Breast Cancer (BC) incidence and the distribution of BC risk factors vary between racial and ethnic groups within the United States. It has been demonstrated that providing education on individualized breast cancer risk will improve patient uptake to recommended BC screening and prevention strategies. Most clinical risk assessment tools, including the validated IBIS model were derived from data using non-Hispanic white women. Consortia have also now identified over 300 common genetic susceptibility loci for BC, summarized by the polygenic risk score (PRS). When combined with clinical risk assessment tools, such as the IBIS or BCRAT models, the PRS can further refine risk estimation for patients. To date, most studies on the use of PRS have been done in non-Hispanic white women. While these PRS still perform well in racial minorities, there has been a recognized need to improve racial and ethnic diversity in genomic research cohorts. Herein, we aim to combine clinical risk assessment models that are already used in routine clinical practice with information derived from PRS testing in women of racial minorities to determine if this can improve risk estimation, patient understanding, and uptake to recommended breast cancer screening and prevention strategies. Design: This is a minimal risk prospective study with a single arm incorporating the PRS into a standard breast cancer risk reduction consultation, followed by annual surveys over 10 years to determine if and how the information provided by the PRS influenced patient decisions regarding recommended BC screening and prevention. Patients will have IBIS and BCRAT risks calculated at baseline visit. A survey of patient perceptions/understanding of risk, intention to undergo screening, and use of preventive medicine is completed after baseline visit prior to receiving the PRS results. Blood sample is obtained at baseline and DNA samples are analyzed for approximately 300 SNPs on a custom-designed, targeted SNP panel from ThermoFisher Scientific by the Mayo Clinic Genomics Laboratory. This PRS result is then combined with the clinical risk assessments (IBIS and BCRAT scores) using the R package Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimators (iCare) tool to provide a new estimate of breast cancer risk for 5year, 10year, and lifetime risk. Patients are seen for follow-up to review results and then complete a second survey to assess their understanding of the results, BC risk, and how the PRS impacted their decision to undergo screening/prevention strategies. Eligibility Criteria: Women who self-identify as African American/Black or Hispanic/Latinx between 30-75 years old with any of the following: 1.)IBIS score of ≥5% for the 10 year risk OR BCRAT score of ≥ 3 % for the 5 year risk. 2.) History of biopsy proven atypical hyperplasia 3.) History of biopsy proven lobular carcinoma in situ. Specific Aims: Aim 1: The primary aim of this study is to explore if the addition of PRS to the BCRAT and IBIS score will improve intentions to undergo recommended breast cancer screening strategies such as mammography, MRI, or molecular breast imaging in women of underserved racial minorities Aim 2: To explore if the addition of the PRS to the BCRAT and IBIS risk score will aid women of racial minorities in deciding whether to take preventative endocrine therapy. Aim 3: To understand how individualized risk assessment and information on PRS may alter perceived risk of breast cancer. Statistical Methods Analysis will be mostly descriptive. Continuous variables will be summarized as mean (standard deviation) or median (range) and categorical variables will be reported as frequency (percentage). Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the long-term cumulative risk of cancer. Current Accrual: 3. Target Accrual: 50 Citation Format: Lauren Cornell, Sandhya Pruthi, Linda Hasadsri, Sarah McLaughlin. Genetic risk estimation in breast cancer and assessing health disparities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl) nr PO4-19-02.

Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey

Racial differences in prevention decision making among U.S. women at high risk of breast cancer: A qualitative study

Abstract PO4-19-02: Genetic risk estimation in breast cancer and assessing health disparities

Validation study of risk-reduction activities after personalized breast cancer education tool in the WISDOM study

Psychosocial factors that influence a woman's decision to enroll in a clinical trial – implications on how to improve clinical trial enrollment among Black women

Conducting Molecular Epidemiological Research in the Age of HIPAA: A Multi-Institutional Case-Control Study of Breast Cancer in African-American and European-American Women

Developing decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase chemoprevention informed choice and uptake: A retrospective translational science case study

Strategies for Identifying and Recruiting Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer for Research Outside of Clinical Settings: Observational Study

Abstract B096: Patient, Provider, and Advocate Perspectives on Factors that Impact Participation of Black Women in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Beyond Tuskegee: A contemporary qualitative assessment of barriers to research participation among Black women

Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions Among Underserved, Hispanic Women: Implications for Risk-Based Approaches to Screening

Abstract B085: Increasing utilization of breast cancer risk assessment tools: Identifying and adapting implementation strategies using multiple stakeholder groups

Abstract PO5-20-05: The FOR ME (Fostering Opportunities in Research through Messaging and Education) study: Using multiple qualitative methods to develop a culturally sensitive narrative intervention to promote equity in clinical trials

Abstract 2162: Framework and pilot testing for the recruitment of a U.S.-based prospective cohort study of 100,000 Black women

Disparities in breast cancer prevention initiatives at a comprehensive cancer center: Who are we serving?

Increasing research study engagement in minoritized populations: An example from the Black Women Inflammation and Tau Study

Critical Risk Assessment, Diagnosis, and Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer

Critical decisions: A mixed-methods study of decision-making among diverse gynecologic cancer patients considering therapeutic clinical trial enrollment

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene trial: Advancing the science of recruitment and breast cancer risk assessment in minority communities

Abstract C150: Evaluating breast cancer risk by race and ethnicity using the Tyrer Cuzick and Gail models in the Komen Tissue Bank cohort

Breast cancer survivorship experiences among Black women